The Tragedy of Globalist Conformists II
or
Waiting for the Storm
At the beginning of Goethe’s Faust II, there’s a highly illuminating exchange:
EMPEROR:
There’s a lack of money, well, so create some.
MEPHISTOPHELES:
I create what you want and create more;
It’s easy, but what’s easy is difficult;
It’s already there, but to get it,
That’s the art, who knows how to begin?
…
CHANCELLOR:
Satan is laying snares of gold for you:
These aren’t pious, righteous matters.
MARSCHALK:
If he succeeds in bringing welcome bounties to court,
I’d tolerate a little wrong.
ARMY MASTER:
The fool is clever, promises what’s good for everyone;
The soldier doesn’t ask where it comes from.[1]
If Goethe’s to be believed there’s always been something slightly diabolical about the creation of money, a practice that has long since been known as “fractional reserve banking”, the practice of creating money out of thin air. It sounds like magic because it is. All depends upon the gullibility of the eyes and ears of the beholder, on them being a brain-dead Globalist/Conformist, who believes everything they see and hear in the news.
Yet, in the books of whoever actually wrote: “Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars”, this demonic skill, this sleight of hand, has always been highly admirable:
“Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had the required appearance of power that could be used to induce people…into surrendering their real wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real compensation). They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory notes. Mr. Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for, so long as he had someone’s stock of gold as a persuader to show his customers.”
“Mr. Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individuals and to governments. These would create overconfidence. Then he would make money scarce, tighten control of the system, and collect the collateral through the obligation of contracts. The cycle was then repeated. These pressures could be used to ignite a war. Then he would control the availability of currency to determine who would win the war. That government which agreed to give him control of its economic system got his support.”
“Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic aid to the enemy of the debtor. The profit derived from this economic methodology made Mr. Rothschild all the more able to expand his wealth. He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by government order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the production of goods and services.”
“In this structure, credit, presented as a pure element called ‘currency,’ has the appearance of capital, but is in effect negative capital. Hence, it has the appearance of service, but is in fact, indebtedness or debt. It is therefore an economic inductance instead of an economic capacitance, and if balanced in no other way, will be balanced by the negation of population (war, genocide) …”
“War is therefore the balancing of the system by killing the true creditors (the public which we have taught to exchange true value for inflated currency) and falling back on whatever is left of the resources of nature and regeneration of those resources.”
If one wishes to find an explanation for the ongoing Genocide by Jab and Hospital Holocaust one can find it here, in this document, which is dated from 1979.
In another part of this curious text it’s stated:
“It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation of a society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent weapons) on a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of social control and destruction of human life, i.e., slavery and genocide.”
And the ideology (justification), which underpins the current strategy of the Global Deep State (the Illuminati/Freemasons), is formulated in the following fashion:
“…in the interest of future world order, peace, and tranquility, it was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public with an ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy (wealth) of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the self-disciplined, responsible, and worthy few. In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure, and apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class of weapons so subtle and sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to earn for themselves the name ‘silent weapons’.”
“In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low-class elements of society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained, and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age, before they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter. In order to achieve such conformity, the lower-class family unit must be disintegrated by a process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment of government-operated day-care centers for the occupationally orphaned children.”
“The final key to economic control had to wait until there was sufficient data and high-speed computing equipment to keep close watch on the economic oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits – paper inductance/inflation.”
What exactly is meant by “shocking” is the following:
“In the shock testing of an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse of firing a gun mounted on that airframe causes shock waves in that structure which tell aviation engineers the conditions under which some parts of the airplane or the whole airplane or its wings will start to vibrate or flutter like a guitar string, a flute reed, or a tuning fork, and disintegrate or fall apart in flight.”
“Economic engineers achieve the same result in studying the behavior of the economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity such as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar, and then causing a sudden change or shock in its price or availability, thus kicking everybody’s budget and buying habits out of shape.”
“They then observe the shock waves which result by monitoring the changes in advertising, prices, and sales of that and other commodities.”
“The objective of such studies is to acquire the know-how to set the public economy into a predictable state of motion or change, even a controlled self-destructive state of motion which will convince the public that certain ‘expert’ people should take control of the money system and reestablish security (rather than liberty and justice) for all. When the subject citizens are rendered unable to control their financial affairs, they, of course, become totally enslaved, a source of cheap labor.”
The “controlled self-destruction” has already begun[2].
In economics one is taught about “business cycles” (boom and bust) and one is persuaded that they are “natural occurrences”.
In reality the game played is extraordinarily simple:
At the “start” of an “economic cycle” the banks lend (out of thin air) “money”[3] at a low interest to creditors who pledge something concrete (property, their earnings etc.) in return. At the end of the cycle the interest rates rise, the borrowers are unable to repay the interest on the loans and the banks take possession of the property or person (one becomes a debt-slave). With such a system it’s not too difficult to understand how exactly the banks have become overwhelmingly powerful and dictate public policy.
Michael Hudson refers to the current western economy as a “FIRE” (Finance, Insurance, Real Estate) economy and one in which:
“The financial sector has the same objective as military conquest: to gain control of land and basic infrastructure and collect tribute. To update von Clausewitz, finance has become war by other means. What formerly took blood and arms is now obtained by debt leverage. Direct ownership is not necessary. If a country’s economic surplus can be taken financially, it is not necessary to conquer or even to own its land, natural resources and infrastructure. Debt leverage saves the cost of having to mount an invasion and suffer casualties. Who needs an expensive occupation against unwilling hosts when you can obtain assets willingly by financial means – as long as debt-strapped nations permit bankers and bondholders to dictate their laws and control their planning and politics? The creditor’s objective is to obtain wealth by indebting populations and even governments and forcing them to pay by relinquishing their property or its income. Such financial conquest is less overtly brutal than warfare waged with guns and missiles, but its demographic effect is just as lethal. For debt-strapped Greece and Latvia, creditor-imposed austerity has caused falling marriage rates, family formation and birth rates, shortening life spans, and rising suicide rates and emigration.”[4]
[1] KAISER:
Es fehlt an Geld, nun gut, so schaff es denn.
MEPHISTOPHELES:
Ich schaffe, was ihr wollt, und schaffe mehr;
Zwar ist es leicht, doch ist das Leichte schwer;
Es liegt schon da, doch um es zu erlangen,
Das ist die Kunst, wer weiß es anzufangen?
…
KANZLER:
Der Satan legt euch goldgewirkte Schlingen:
Es geht nicht zu mit frommen rechten Dingen.
MARSCHALK:
Schafft’ er uns nur zu Hof willkommne Gaben,
Ich wollte gern ein bißchen Unrecht haben.
HEERMEISTER:
Der Narr ist klug, verspricht, was jedem frommt;
Fragt der Soldat doch nicht, woher es kommt.
[3] It must be noted that there is a case of a man who won a court case against a bank because the “money” the bank had created was “out of thin air”.
[4] p.316 Killing the Host, Michael Hudson
In 1916 Lenin wrote about the inevitable rise of the banks and about the financial industry overtaking the production industry. In hindsight, this was easy to predict. Banks lend money only to their favorite enterprises, of which they are shareholders. Their competition is strangled by lack of investments. In the long run, this guarantees the dominance of credit-power over real labor. And money can move much faster than factories. What results from this is imperialism, with the banking system (off-shore and The City) hiding the identity of the real stakeholders, thus shielding them from any accountability. Profits are private, losses are public. Napoleon, in order to secure credits from the Banque de France, pledged to shield the bank from any losses. The Banque de France was a branch of the Bank of England. And so the funds for both camps in the Napoleon vs Wellington battle came from one and the same source. The Rothschilds profited handsomely, as we now know.
Indeed, banking is the continuation of war with other means.