The Question of Zionism III
It was the Zionists who saved Nazi Germany
In the same way that Zionists made use of Palestinian terror after the war so they made use of Nazi terror before it.
“In 1935, Jewish existence continued to contract as fewer Jewish people could even survive in the Reich. Getting out was the only alternative to inevitable starvation.”
“As Jewish existence was dismantling in Germany, however it was reconstructed in Jewish Palestine. The Haavara brought in many of the fundamentals: coal, iron, cement, fertilizer, seed, hammers, saws and cultivators. Haavara also brought in the capital: cash, loans, mortgages, deposits, and credits. All this produced an economic explosion in Jewish Palestine, requiring companies to be formed, investments to be made, and most of all, jobs to be filled.”
“Palestine’s economic absorptiveness tripled, perhaps quadrupled, within a year or so of the Transfer Agreement. Economic opportunity translated into a dramatic increase in immigration certificates under the twice-yearly ‘worker quota’. Most of these certificates were awarded to Mapai’s halutzim, the young worker pioneers eager to plant the seed, dig the ditches, and trowel the cement. As more buildings were erected, more kibbutzim established, and more small factories founded, ever more job openings were created for halutzim. The spiral of economic expansion increased the flow of worker immigrants from just a few thousand yearly before the Transfer Agreement to more than 50,000 during the two years following. Most were Mapai halutzim, and only about 20 percent of them were from Germany.”[1]
The worker pioneer camps in Nazi Germany played a key role in this system. “The occupational retraining of German Jews going to Palestine was taken up seriously by German Zionists almost immediately after Hitler’s appointment as chancellor in 1933. By 1936, an extensive system of retraining centers, run by Hechaluz and sponsored by various Zionist groups and relief agencies, was functioning throughout Germany.”[2]
This was very much welcomed by the British: “Zionist retraining efforts also enjoyed the encouragement of the British Embassy in Berlin. A British Embassy memorandum of April 3, 1936, asserted that the Umschulungslager run by Hechaluz enabled the Jewish Agency to select suitable candidates for admission to Palestine, better prepared for absorption into the economic life of the country.”[3]
Neither the British nor the Germans seemed interested in the boycott movement, which, as Edwin Black makes abundantly clear, was the only hope of saving the German Jews from annihilation. Again, as Edwin Black shows: it was Zionists who saved Nazi Germany. This was one reason for German cooperation: “The anti-boycott success of the German delegation and its allies at the Lucerne Congress strengthened the relatively positive attitude of cooperation with Zionism on the part of the SD.”[4] German support included providing the Hagana with weaponry.[5]
One thing should become slowly, but abundantly clear: Zionism is and has never been a friend of the Jews[6]. Nor have either Britain or America been friends of the Jews. It shouldn’t be forgotten that neither Britain nor America did anything to save the German Jews; on the contrary. When a conference was held in Bermuda in April 1943 it was decided to leave them to their fate. And this was at a point in time when their suffering was perfectly well known.[7]
Other Zionists, such as Moses Hess, writing in the 1860s, were more explicit than Herzl (who was writing in the 1890s) in their desire to see the religion of Judaism abolished: “Judaism, in fact, like Christianity, would have to dissolve in consequence of the Enlightenment, if it were no more than a dogmatic religion, if it were not a national worship. The Jewish reformers, who still give their theatrical performances in some German communities, know so little about the importance of Judaism, that they are careful to eliminate everything that is reminiscent of the Jewish nationality from teaching and worship.”[8]
Instead of being a religion, Judaism was, for Hess, the starting point of a nationality: “As a matter of fact, Judaism, as a nationality, has a natural basis which cannot be supplanted by another as a creed. A Jew, according to his descent, always belongs to Judaism, regardless of whether he or his ancestors became apostates. – That may seem paradoxical to modern concepts of religion. In practice, at least, I have found this view proven. Even the baptized Jew remains a Jew, no matter how much he resists it. Today there is hardly any difference between the enlightened and the baptized.”[9] That many, such as Klemperer, saw no difference between the Zionists and the Nazis should hardly surprise.
The key point, of course, is that Judaism has always been a religion and never a nation. After all: how could it be? Judaism and Christianity, like Islam, are to be found in many nations spread across the globe.
Is Zionism Part of a Satanist Project to Rule the World?
What is well worth mentioning is the fact that Zionism was mentioned in the Pike letter to Manzini of 1871. In fact, it plays a leading role:
“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.”
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other.”
[1] p.373 The Transfer Agreement Edwin Black
[2] p.58 The Third Reich and the Palestine Question Francis R. Nicosia
[3] p.59 Ibid
[4] p.61 Ibid
[5] p. 63 Ibid
[6] Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Alan Hart
[7] Auschwitz and the Allies, Martin Gilbert
[8] p.38 Rom und Jerusalem – Die letzte Nationalitaetenfrage, Ausgabe von 1899, Moses Hess
[9] p.40 Ibid
Do you think it's possible that the Arab world is holding back from massive response to Israel's genocide of the Palestinians because they do not wish to be led down the path outlined in that letter?