The New Epidemics 2
What is happening to us?
The New Epidemics 2
According to a paper[1] published in July 2023:
“Although the protective benefits of vaccination are well-established in the medical literature, some studies have challenged the idea that when more vaccines are administered, it always results in fewer deaths. For example, Aaby et al. discovered that in some low-income nations vaccines have non-specific effects (NSEs) that can increase or decrease mortality from infectious diseases not targeted by the vaccine. Mogensen et al. found that all-cause infant mortality in Guinea-Bissau increased twofold after diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) and oral polio vaccines were introduced (hazard ratio, HR = 2.12). Survival rates in infants who received DTP only (without an oral polio vaccine) as compared to non-DTP vaccinated children were significantly worse (HR = 10.0). Differences in background factors did not explain the effect.”
“Fisker and Thysen found that the sequence of administered vaccines affects all-cause mortality. Girls who received a pentavalent vaccine (DTP-Haemophilus influenzae type b-hepatitis B) after receiving a measles vaccine were five times more likely to die from all causes within six months of follow-up when compared with girls who received vaccines in the recommended sequence (HR = 5.10). The authors rendered a cautionary statement: ‘It is assumed that providing missing vaccine doses will always leave the child better off than not providing them. This may be wrong.’”
Angelo DePalma reported[2] on these findings:
“Developed nations requiring the most neonatal vaccine doses tend to have the worst childhood mortality rates, according to a peer-reviewed study published July 20 in Cureus Journal of Medical Science.”
“‘Health authorities emphasize that vaccines save lives,’ lead author Neil Miller told The Defender. “Yet our data suggests that when developed nations require two versus zero neonatal vaccine doses, or many versus fewer vaccines during infancy, there may be unintended consequences that increase all-cause mortality.’”
“Miller, director of the Institute of Medical and Scientific Inquiry in Santa Fe, New Mexico, has been researching this topic since the early 2000s. In a 2011 paper with the same co-author — Gary S. Goldman, Ph.D., an independent computer scientist — they showed that developed countries requiring the most vaccine doses for infants had the least favorable infant mortality rates.”
“Earlier this year, they replicated those results using updated data and responded to critics of their findings.”
“In their latest study, Miller and Goldman expanded the scope of their earlier analyses to consider the effects of two vaccines — hepatitis B and tuberculosis — both typically given soon after birth.”
“The study calculated the effect of these shots on mortality rates for neonates (up to 28 days post-birth), infants (up to 1 year old), and children under 5. Analyses were all based on separate data from 2019 and 2021.”
“Mortality data and vaccine schedules were collected from UNICEF, the World Health Organization and national governments.”
“Nations were categorized by the number of neonatal vaccine doses (zero, one or two) mandated for newborns to determine if statistically significant differences existed in mortality rates for the three age groups.”
“After applying standard statistical analyses to the data, the study found a strong association between vaccinations and rates of neonatal, infant and under-5 mortality for both years studied.”
“‘Our findings would be considered moderate correlations which are statistically significant,’ Miller said. The correlations are positive, meaning that the more vaccine doses given, the higher the mortality.”
“‘In these circumstances health authorities expect to see negative correlations, that is, a decline in mortality with more vaccine doses. So, any statistically significant positive correlation is a genuine concern,’” Miller said.
“Miller calculated a highly significant difference of 1.28 deaths per 1,000 live births in the mean infant mortality rates between nations not giving their neonates any vaccine doses, and those requiring vaccination against both hepatitis B and tuberculosis.”
“For each reduction of six vaccine doses administered during infancy, the infant mortality rate improved by approximately one death per 1,000 live births.”
“A hallmark of good science is the good-faith openness to test one’s conclusions, a practice Miller and Goldman followed here. To validate their conclusions, the researchers applied 18 different statistical analyses to the data. This is like using several different camera angles to confirm whether a tennis ball hit the line or was out.”
“Seventeen of 18 statistical treatments confirmed the original conclusion that the more vaccines given, the higher the infant and early childhood mortality rates.”
Dr. Tess Lawrie adds[3]:
“In the context of emerging revelations of regulatory body incompetence and corruption, e.g. The Perseus Report, the WCH Health and Science Committee notes that:
Several research studies now indicate that vaccinated children have far worse health outcomes with higher rates of many chronic diseases than non-vaccinated children.
The integrity of scientific research and the regulatory process of childhood vaccines, including the new nasal ‘flu’ vaccine, now being administered en masse in schools is in question.
Pharmaceutical corporations have a long-standing history of misrepresenting products that cause injuries and deaths. Pfizer, for instance, has paid the largest criminal settlement in history for drug fraud. The childhood vaccination schedule provides these unscrupulous corporations with unregulated access to the bodies of our children.
Modern society is experiencing unprecedented rates of autism, asthma, allergies, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, obesity, depression and more, for which the root cause/s have not been established.
Much of what we have been told about the success of early vaccines, including smallpox and polio vaccines is emerging as untrue. Clean water, modern plumbing, hygiene, refrigeration, and improved nutrition are real factors that have correlated with the dramatic reduction in many infectious diseases over the past century.
National regulatory agencies have never done the necessary evaluation to determine whether vaccines given to children alone or together according to the ever-expanding childhood vaccination schedules are associated with poor health outcomes compared with children who are not vaccinated.
National regulatory agencies have been turning a blind eye to the mounting evidence linking childhood vaccination with autism that has emerged since a possible link was first suggested in 1998.
National regulatory agencies have also been turning a blind eye to the mounting evidence linking childhood vaccination with other diseases, including asthma, allergies, and bowel disease.”
Given the wealth of new information it’s time to radically rethink the safety and efficacy of vaccinations.
Given the fact that we already knew this in 1977 it’s extremely annoying that this has been denied, covered-up and forgotten. Already, in 1977, Ida Honorof & E. McBean wrote:
“Vaccines (poisons) were concocted to ‘fight’ harmless bacteria without success—the only result being the poisoning of the patients (victims) with severe disruption of normal body functions and processes, leading to more severe diseases than that which were being ‘fought.’ Then more vaccines were concocted to ‘fight’ harmless viruses with success—the only result again being the production of worse effects than the normal natural beneficial acute symptoms they were trying to present.”
“The public is thoroughly brainwashed in the virus theory, to the extent that the common excuse for an ailment is that ‘I’ve caught a virus’ or ‘I’ve come down with a virus,’ But now, since all of their ‘attacks’ on innocent viruses have failed, the medicine men are looking for other villains to blame for disease. They are now toying around with the idea of possession by ‘evil spirits’ again since they cannot find any other culprit.”
“They claim psychosomatic causes. They are experimenting with acupuncture, used for thousands of years by the Chinese. They are experimenting with herbs, used for thousands of years by the Chinese. They are experimenting with new chemicals and drugs, concocted by the pharmaceutical empire since all of the old ones are absolute failures. They are experimenting with vaccines. And the gullible public furnishes all of the guinea pigs for their experiments.”
“The medicine men and the public refuse to examine that only diet, habits and environment (rarely hereditary) can disrupt the normal health of a person— a matter of unwitting, ignorant, pure self-abuse and medical abuse. To admit this would put an end to medical practice forever. And those who would reveal these facts to the world are condemned by the powerful medical association— and the people who resist any idea that they are causing their own illnesses by their foolish diets, habits and environmental pollution, since they are addicted to their way of life and don't want to change it.”
“Diseases of all names are the invention of the medicine men, designed to confuse and frighten the public and set up the medicine men as ‘authorities,’ to whom the people must look for help. A particular disease is not an entity as medicine men want you to believe, but the combination of a certain number of specific, simple symptoms (acute diseases), or particular structural effects of persistent abuse of one’s body (chronic diseases).”[4]
[1] https://www.cureus.com/articles/164423-neonatal-infant-and-under-age-five-vaccine-doses-routinely-given-in-developed-nations-and-their-association-with-mortality-rates#!/
[2] https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/infant-vaccines-all-cause-mortality/?fbclid=IwAR2DskUmq021HjWMpzSIF0vndqjpqeQQ_3UrP8qJMOb1s4FVTkedbUu84L0
[4] pp.3-4 Vaccination the Silent Killer, Ida Honorof & E. McBean
Learning all about this fraud only in the last 3 years. Trying to open parents eyes to this isn't easy as they are brainwashed, as I was. I think it's harder to get people to look at anything that is against the group think.