The Big Fraud #3
Notes and Quotes from: The Real Anthony Fauci II
Hydroxychloroquine
“From the outset, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and other therapeutics posed an existential threat to Dr. Fauci’s and Bill Gates’ $48 billion COVID vaccine project, and particularly to their vanity drug remdesivir, in which Gates has a large stake. Under federal law, new vaccines and medicines cannot qualify for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) if any existing FDA-approved drug proves effective against the same malady.”
“Dr. Fauci has invested $6 billion in taxpayer’s lucre in the Moderna vaccine alone. His agency is co-owner of the patent and stands to collect a fortune in royalties. At least four of Dr. Fauci’s hand-picked deputies are in line to collect royalties of $150,000/year based on Moderna’s success…”
“Dr. Fauci’s challenge – to prove that HCQ is dangerous – was demanding because hydroxychloroquine is a 65-year-old formula that regulators around the globe long ago approved to be both safe and effective against a variety of illnesses… It is a generally benign prescriptive medicine, far safer – according to the manufacturer’s package inserts – than many popular over-the-counter drugs.”
“Some 200 peer-reviewed studies by governments and independent researchers deem HCQ safe and effective against C-19, especially when taken prophylactically or when taken in the initial stages of illness along with zinc & Zithromax…”
“The scientific literature first suggested that HCQ or CQ might be effective treatments for Coronavirus in 2004…”
“A CDC study published in 2005 in the Virology Journal, ‘Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronaviruses’ Infection and Spread’ demonstrated that CQ quickly eliminated coronaviruses in private cell culture during the SARS outbreak. That study concludes: ‘We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-Coronavirus infection of primate cells… (both) before and after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantages.’ This conclusion was particularly threatening to vaccine makers since it implies that chloroquine functions both as a preventative ‘vaccine’ as well as a cure for SARS coronavirus… Worse still for Dr. Fauci and his vaccine making friends, a NIAD study and a Dutch paper, both in 2014, confirmed chloroquine was effective against MERS – still another coronavirus.”
“In response to their studies, physicians worldwide discovered early in the pandemic that they could successfully treat high-risk COVID-19 patients, as outpatients, within the first seven days of the onset of symptoms with a chloroquine drug alone or with a ‘cocktail’ consisting of hydroxychloroquine, zinc, azithromycin (or doxycycline).”
“Multiple scholarly contributions to the literature quickly confirmed the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine and hydroxychloroquine-based combination treatment when administered within days of COVID symptoms. Studies confirming this occurred in China, France, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Italy, India etc. etc.”
“HCQ’s first prominent champion was Dr. Didier Raoult, the iconic French infectious disease professor, who has published more than 2,700 papers and is famous for having discovered 100 micro-organisms, including the pathogen that causes Wipple’s Disease.”
“On March 17, 2020, Dr. Raoult provided a preliminary report on 36 patients treated successfully with hydroxychloroquine and sometimes azithromycin at his institution in Marseille.”
“In April, Dr. Vladimir (Zev) Zelenko, M.D., an upstate New York physician and early HCQ adopter, reproduced D. Didier Raoult’s ‘startling successes’ by dramatically reducing expected mortalities among 800 patients Zelenko treated with the HCQ cocktails.”
“By late April of 2020, US doctors were widely prescribing HCQ to patients and family members, reporting outstanding results, and taking it themselves prophylactically.”
“In May 2020, Dr. Harvey Risch M.D., Ph.D., published the most comprehensive study, to date, on HCQ’s efficacy against COVID. Risch is Yale University’s super-eminent Professor of Epidemiology, as illustrious world authority on the analysis of aggregate clinical data. Dr. Risch concluded that evidence is unequivocal for early and safe use of the HCQ cocktail. Dr. Risch published his work – a meta-analysis reviewing five outpatient studies – in affiliation with the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in the American Journal of Epidemiology, under the urgent title ‘Early Outpatient Treatment of Symptomatic, High Risk COVID-19 Patients that should be Ramped-Up Immediately as Key to Pandemic Crisis.’”
“He further demonstrated, with specificity, how HCQ’s critics – largely funded by Bill Gates and Tony Fauci – had misinterpreted, misstated, and misrepresented negative results by employing faulty protocols, most of which showed HCQ efficacy administered without zinc and Zithromax which were known to be helpful. But their main trick for ensuring the protocols failed was to wait until late in the disease process before administering HCQ – when it was known to be ineffective… Dr. Risch: ‘The first study of HCQ & AZ vs. standard of care…This is such an enormous difference that it can’t be ignored despite lack of randomization.’”
“Furthermore, an August 2020 paper from Baylor University by Dr. Peter McCullough et al. described mechanisms by which the components of the ‘HCQ cocktail’ exert antiviral effects. McCullough shows that the efficacy of HCQ cocktail is based on the pharmacology of the hydroxychloroquine ionophore acting as the ‘gun’ and the zinc as the ‘bullet’, while azithromycin potentiates the anti-viral effect.”
“An even more expansive September 30, 2020 meta-review summarizes more recent research, concluding that ALL the studies on early administration of HCQ within a week following infection demonstrate efficacy, while studies of HCQ administered late in the illness showed mixed results.”
“The prospect of an existing therapeutic drug (with an expired patent) that could outperform any vaccine in the war against COVID posed a momentous threat to the pharmaceutical cartel. Among the features pharma companies most detest is low cost, and HCQ is about $10 per course. Compare that to the more than &3,000 per course for Dr. Fauci’s beloved remdesivir.”
“No surprise, pharmaceutical interests launched their multinational preemptive crusade to restrict and discredit HCQ starting way back in January 2020, months before the WHO declared a pandemic and even longer before President Trump’s controversial March 19 endorsement.”
“On January 13, when rumors of Wuhan flu COVID-19 began to circulate, the French government took the bizarre, inexplicable, unprecedented, and highly suspicious step of reassigning HCQ from an over-the-counter to a prescriptive medicine. Without citing any studies, French health officials quietly changed the status of HCQ to ‘list II poisonous substance’ and banned its over-the-counter-sale. This absolutely remarkable coincidence repeated itself a few weeks later when Canadian health officials did the exact same thing, quietly removing the drug from pharmacy shelves.”
“A physician from Zambia reported to Dr. Harvey Risch that in some villages and cities, organized groups of boys emptied drugstores of HCQ and then burned the medication in bonfires outside the towns. South Africa destroyed two tons of life-saving hydroxychloroquine in late 2020, supposedly due to violation of an import regulation. The US government in 2021 ordered the destruction of more than a thousand pounds of HCQ, because it was improperly imported. ‘The Feds are insisting that all of it be destroyed, and not be used to save a single life anywhere in the world,’ said a lawyer seeking to resist the senseless order.”
“By March, front-line doctors around the world were spontaneously reporting miraculous results following early treatment with HCQ, and this prompted growing anxiety for Pharma.”
“It was a March 2020 news conference where Dr. Fauci launched his concerted attack on HCQ. Asked whether HCQ might be used as a prophylaxis for COVID, he shouted back: ‘The answer is No, and the evidence that you’re talking about is anecdotal evidence.’ His reliable allies at the New York Times then launched a campaign to defame Dr. Raoult.”
“In March, at the HH’s request several large pharmaceutical companies – Novartis, Bayer, Sanofil and others – donated their inventory, a total of 63 million doses of hydroxychloroquine and 2 million of chloroquine, to the Strategic National Stockpile, managed by BARDA, an agency under the DHHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response. BARDA’s Director, Dr. Rick Bright, later claimed the chloroquine drugs were deadly, and he needed to protect the American public from them. Bright colluded with FDA to restrict use of the donated pills to hospitalized patients. FDA publicized the authorization using language that led most physicians to believe that prescribing the drug for any purpose was off-limits.”
“But at the beginning of June, based on clinical trials that intentionally gave unreasonably high doses to hospitalized patients and failed to start the drug until too late, FDA took the unprecedented step of revoking HCQ’s emergency authorization, rendering the enormous stockpile of valuable pills off-limits to Americans while conveniently indemnifying the pharmaceutical companies for their inventory losses by allowing them a tax break for the donations.”
“After widespread use of the drug for 65 years, without warning, FDA somehow felt the need to send out an alert on June 15, 2020 that HCQ is dangerous, and that it required a level of monitoring only available in hospitals. In a bit of twisted logic, Federal officials continued to encourage doctors to use the suddenly dangerous drug without restriction for lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Lyme and malaria. Just not for COVID. With the encouragement of Dr. Fauci and other HHS officials, many states simultaneously imposed restrictions on HCQ’s use.”
“Prior to COVID-19, not a single study had provided evidence against the use of HCQ based on safety concerns.”
“Dr. Fauci, Bill Gates, and WHO financed a cadre of research mercenaries to concoct a series of nearly twenty studies – all employing fraudulent protocols deliberately designed to discredit HCQ as unsafe. Instead of using the standard dose of 400 mg/day, the 17 WHO studies administered a borderline lethal daily dose starting with 2,400 mg on Day 1 and using 800 mg/day thereafter. In a cynical, sinister, and literally homicidal crusade against HCQ, a team of BMGF operatives played a key role in devising and pushing through the exceptionally high dosing. They made sure that UK government ‘Recovery’ trials on 1,000 elderly patients in over a dozen British, Welsh, Irish and Scottish hospitals, and the UN ‘Solidarity’ study of 3,500 patients in 400 hospitals in 35 countries, as well as additional sites in 13 countries (the ‘REMAP-COVID’ trial), all used these unprecedented and dangerous doses. This was a brassy enterprise to ‘prove’ chloroquine dangerous, and, sure enough, it proved that elderly patients can die from deadly overdoses. ‘The purpose seemed, very clearly, to poison the patients and blame the deaths on HCQ,’ says Dr. Meryl Nass, a physician, medical historian and biowarfare expert.”
“In each of these two trials, SOLIDARITY and RECOVERY, the hydroxychloroquine arm predictably had 10-20 percent more deaths than the control arm (the control arm being those patients lucky enough to receive standard supportive care).”
“Gates and his cabal used an arsenal of other deceptive gimmickry to assure that HCQ would appear not just deadly, but ineffective. Each of the studies that Gates funded failed to incorporate Zithromax and zinc – important components of HCQ protocols.”
“All of the Fauci, Gates, WHO, Solidarity, Recovery and Remap-COVID studies administered HCQ at late stages of COVID infection, in contravention of the prevailing recommendations, that deem HCQ effective only when doctors administer it early.”
“It remains an enduring mystery just which powerful figure(s) caused the world’s two most prestigious scientific journals, The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), to publish overtly fraudulent studies from a nonexistent database owned by a previously unknown company. Anthony Fauci and the vaccine cartel celebrated the Lancet and the NEJM papers on May 22, 2020 as the final nail in hydroxychloroquine’s coffin.”
“Both studies in these respected publications relied on data from the Surgisphere Corporation, an obscure Illinois-based ‘medical education’ company that claimed to somehow control an extraordinary global database boasting access to medical information from 96,000 patients in more than 600 hospitals. Founded in 2008, this sketchy enterprise had eleven employees, including a middling science fiction writer and a porn star/events hostess. Surgisphere claimed to have analyzed data from six continents and hundreds of hospitals that had treated patients with HCQ or CQ in real time. Someone persuaded The Lancet and the New England Journal of Medicine to publish two Surgisphere studies in separate articles on May 1 and 22. Like other Gates-supported studies, the Lancet article portrayed HCQ as ineffective and dangerous.”
“The Lancet study said that the Surgisphere data proved that HCQ increased cardiac mortality in COVID-19 patients. Based on this study, the FDA withdrew its EUA recommendation on June 15, 2020, the WHO and UK suspended their hydroxychloroquine clinical trials on May 25. Each resumed briefly, then stopped for good in June declaring HCQ unhelpful. Three European nations immediately banned use of HCQ, and others followed within weeks.”
“That would normally have been the end of it, if not for the 200 independent scientists who quickly exposed the Lancet and NEJM studies as shockingly clumsy con jobs. The Surgisphere datasets that formed the foundation of the studies were so ridiculously erroneous that they could only have been a rank invention.”
“An international brouhaha quickly revealed that the Surgisphere database did not exist, and soon enough, Surgisphere itself vanished…”
“Referring to the Lancet Surgisphere study during a May 27 CNN interview, Dr. Fauci stated on CNN about hydroxychloroquine ‘The scientific date is really quite evident now about the lack of efficacy.’ And even after the scandal lay exposed and the journals retracted their articles Dr. Fauci let his lie stand…”
“The historic journal retractions went practically unnoticed in the slavish, scientifically illiterate mainstream press, which persisted in fortifying COVID propaganda. Headlines continued to blame HCQ for the deaths instead of the deliberate treacherous researchers who gave sick, elderly, and compromised patients toxic day dosages. And most remarkable of all, the FDA made no effort to change the recommendation made against HCQ…”
Best synopsis I have seen. Kudos, Michael.
There was, actually, a 2005 study listed in the NIH National Library of Medicine (yes, Director Fauci’s NIH) literature that showed Chloroquine/HCQ effective against Sars Cov 2.
Chloroquine is a Potent Inhibitor of SARS Coronavirus Infection and Spread
Martin J Vincent et al. Virol J. 2005.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is caused by a newly discovered coronavirus (SARS-CoV). No effective prophylactic or post-exposure therapy is currently available.
Results: We report, however, that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells. These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage. In addition to the well-known functions of chloroquine such as elevations of endosomal pH, the drug appears to interfere with terminal glycosylation of the cellular receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. This may negatively influence the virus-receptor binding and abrogate the infection, with further ramifications by the elevation of vesicular pH, resulting in the inhibition of infection and spread of SARS CoV at clinically admissible concentrations.
Conclusion: Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection. In addition, the indirect immunofluorescence assay described herein represents a simple and rapid method for screening SARS-CoV antiviral compounds.
Full:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16115318/