Reflections on October 7th
Those who focus merely on October 7th are like those who only focus on the death of Ernst vom Rath in 1938: they are true Nazis.
Reflections on October 7th
Those who focus merely on October 7th are like those who only focus on the death of Ernst vom Rath in 1938: they are true Nazis.
Those who argue that „everything began with October 7th”, that “Hamas shouldn’t have attacked”, that Hamas “shouldn’t have taken hostages” and that “Gaza needs to be liberated from Hamas” are directly responsible for genocide. All of them, without one single exception, belong in jail.
Such cold, callous, cruel, brutal and idiotic utterances, which only either knaves, fools or complete and utter psychopaths could make, excuse and justify one of the worst crimes of human history. They imply that it’s perfectly justifiable to murder women and children; all one needs is the appropriate excuse. And they imply that the women and children currently being slaughtered are somehow culpable of the crimes of Hamas; that they are themselves, as the Israelis repeat again and again, “Hamas”, that there are “no innocents in Gaza”; they imply that there are no differences and no distinctions. But what could a baby, born shortly before or after October 7th have to do with an attack Hamas planned in 2022 and executed in 2023? How can it be found guilty of such a crime and why should it be executed or starved to death or killed by neglect?
It is wise and prudent to study history.
Those who focus merely on October 7th are like those who only focus on the death of Ernst vom Rath in 1938: they are true Nazis.
“When Ernst vom Rath went to work” we are told “on the morning of November 7, 1938, he had no idea he would soon be mortally wounded—or that his death would serve as the excuse for a two-day terror attack on German Jews. He was at work at the German embassy in Paris when Herschel Grynszpan, a 17-year-old Polish Jew, walked up to him and fired five times at close range.”
“Days later, vom Rath was dead and the streets of Germany were littered with shards of broken glass. The young diplomat’s death was used as the excuse for Kristallnacht, a two-day, nationwide pogrom against Germany’s Jews that is now seen as a harbinger for the Holocaust.”[1]
Those who focus on October 7th are like those Nazis who justified the Kristallnacht and later the Holocaust by pointing at the crime of Grynszpan. It was all Grynszpan’s fault! One need look no further! Anybody complaining about the Holocaust justifies the crime of Grynszpan and is a terrorist!
“On 14 October 1943, an armed uprising at Sobibór took place” we are told “and hundreds of prisoners were able to escape…The uprising began at 4pm on 14 October 1943, when Johann Niemann, the acting commandant, was killed after being lured into the tailors’ workshop in Camp I. Over the following hour the prisoners managed to kill nine other SS officers.”[2]
Those who focus on October 7th are like those who focus exclusively on the death of Johann Niemann and the “nine other SS officers”. How appalling! To kill an officer in cold blood! And to kill NINE of his fellow officers also in cold blood! Only a brute, a monster, an extremist, a terrorist could justify such a slaying!
“On the morning of June 10, 1944, only four days after D-Day,” we are told “the citizens of Oradour woke to what they assumed would be another normal day. During the war, Oradour had not seen much action and townspeople saw few Germans passing through the city. Around 2 p.m., under the command of SS-Sturmbannführer (Major) Adolf Diekmann, somewhere between 120 and 200 soldiers of the Panzer regiment Der Führer encircled the town blocking all entrances and exits.”
“The town crier was sent to relay the message that all citizens, including the sick and elderly, were to report to the town market center. Armored cars gathered citizens who were out working in the fields and within an hour the Germans had rounded up every villager they could find in the market center. Most citizens were at first unconcerned, believing the Germans had arrived for a routine identification check. It was not long before the citizens realized that nothing about the exercise was routine.”
“First, SS troops separated the men from the women and children. An officer announced to the men that he knew of hidden weapons and ammunition supplies, and that whoever was hiding them must step forward immediately. This charge was unsubstantiated, as no one in Oradour was known to have taken part in resistance activity. When nothing came of the demand for arms, the 197 men were divided into groups and forced into six separate barns located throughout the village. When a signal was given, the SS men opened fire with machine guns, murdering the men lined up before them. There were 240 women and 205 children that were forced into the village church.”
“Once locked inside, the troops first threw in grenades, injuring some while suffocating others with smoke. Panic ensued within, and the SS then set fire to the building while shooting anyone who attempted to escape. After setting fire to the church, the Germans searched for and killed anyone left hiding in the village and continued on by burning the rest of Oradour to the ground. Only seven people survived the massacre – five men who were protected by fallen bodies, a woman who had escaped through a window of the church, and a child who had managed to escape before the Der Führer regiment began rounding up the townspeople.”
“It is through the survivors’ testimonies that historians were able to piece together the events that occurred in the town. Madame Marguerite Rouffanche, the sole survivor from the church, spent over a year recovering from her injuries. After jumping from the church window, she was shot five times before crawling into a garden where she hid until she was rescued the following afternoon. Madame Rouffanche gave her testimony at the Bordeaux trial in 1953, where she recounted the events she witnessed on June 10, 1944.”
“The reason for the German attack on Oradour remains unknown. After the incident, the German high command released an explanation stating insurgents had attacked the Division, resulting in fighting which killed the civilians. A common explanation was that Lammerding received word the villagers were assisting the resistance by aiding with the kidnapping of SS-Sturmbannführer (Major) Helmut Kämpfe, a decorated Nazi officer who was assassinated by the French Resistance.”[3]
Was the only one who counted in the scenario Major Helmut Kämpfe? Was his assassination the only crime which counted? Those who argue that only October 7th matters would doubtlessly think so.
[1] https://www.history.com/news/kristallnacht-started-when-this-diplomat-was-murdered-in-cold-blood
[2] https://www.theholocaustexplained.org/the-camps/case-study-sobibor/the-sobibor-uprising/
[3] https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/oradour-sur-glane-martyred-village
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mArZ60k9EEo&ab_channel=NovaraMedia
I think the IDF and Mossad either planned the false-flag, or knew about it and let it happen, much like FDR and Pearl Harbor. To quote the Khazarian Mafioso, Rahm Emanuel, "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before." Translation: "If you want to do things that you normally could not do, make a crisis happen."