Part 1 of Genocide, Variations on a Theme #III

“Inoculations” have always been a means of culling the population

Genocide, Variations on a Theme #III Part 1

“Inoculations” have always been a means of culling the population

“Inoculations” have always been a means of culling the population; we’ve simply forgotten the fact. Already, in 1764, it was written:

“‘It does not follow Inoculation is a practice favourable to life…It is incontestably like the plague a contagious disease, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contagion tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise have been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are manifestly multiplied very greatly by Inoculation…’”[1]

“According to the author, in the 38 years preceding the start of inoculation in 1721, deaths from smallpox relative to the number born was 90 per 1,000, and relative to the number of burials 64 per 1,000. In the 38 years after the start of inoculation, deaths from smallpox relative to the number born increased 127 per 1,000 (a 41 percent increase) and relative to the number of burials 81 per 1,000 (a 27 percent increase).”[2]

In “…Bavaria (Germany) in 1871 of 30,742 cases 29,49 were in vaccinated persons, or 95.7 per cent, and 1313 in the unvaccinated, or 4.3 per cent. In some of the small local outbreaks of recent years the victims have been nearly all vaccinated (e.g., at Bromley (England) in 1881, a total of 43 cases, including sixteen confluent, all vaccinated).”[3]

The success of vaccines, by contrast, has always been somewhat exaggerated:

“…by the 1950s when whooping cough vaccine was introduced, data showed that whooping cough was killing only 1 percent of the numbers of people who used to die in England and Wales 50 years before.”

“Official data showed that the same happened with measles. Indeed, when the measles vaccine was introduced to the UK in 1968, the death rate continued to drop steadily, even though the initial uptake of the vaccine was only 30 percent and didn’t get above 50% until the 1980s.”

“Even the much-heralded success story of smallpox vaccination was not what it seemed. The enforcement of the compulsory smallpox vaccination law in 1867, when the death rate was already falling was accompanied by an increase in the deaths from 100 to 400 deaths per million.”[4]

“Medical historians” Eustace Mullins tells us “have finally come to the reluctant conclusion that the great flu ‘epidemic’ of 1918 was solely attributable to the widespread use of vaccines. It was the first war in which vaccination was compulsory for all servicemen. The Boston Herald reported that forty-seven soldiers had been killed by vaccination in one month. As a result, the military hospitals were filled, not with wounded combat casualties, but with casualties of the vaccine. The epidemic was called ‘the Spanish Influenza,’ a deliberately misleading appellation, which was intended to conceal its origin. This flu epidemic claimed twenty million victims; those who survived it were the ones who had refused the vaccine. In recent years, annual recurring epidemics of flu are called ‘the Russian Flu.’ For some reason, the Russians never protest, perhaps because the Rockefellers make regular trips to Moscow to lay down the party line.”

“The perils of vaccination were already known. Plain Talk magazine notes that ‘during the Franco-Prussian War, every German soldier was vaccinated. The result was that 53,288 otherwise healthy men developed smallpox. The death rate was high.’”[5]

Kevin Barry tells us[6]:

“During the mid-2000’s there was much talk about ‘pandemic preparedness.’  Influenza vaccine manufacturers in the United States received billions of taxpayer dollars to develop vaccines to make sure that we don’t have another lethal pandemic ‘flu,’ like the one in 1918-19.”

“Capitalizing on the ‘flu’ part of Spanish flu helped vaccine manufacturers procure billion dollar checks from governments, even though scientists knew at the time that bacterial pneumonia was the real killer.”

“According to a 2008 National Institute of Health paper[7], bacterial pneumonia was the killer in a minimum of 92.7% of the 1918-19 autopsies reviewed.  It is likely higher than 92.7%.

The researchers looked at more than 9000 autopsies, and ‘there were no negative (bacterial) lung culture results.’”

“‘… In the 68 higher-quality autopsy series, in which the possibility of unreported negative cultures could be excluded, 92.7% of autopsy lung cultures were positive for ≥1 bacterium. … in one study of approximately 9000 subjects who were followed from clinical presentation with influenza to resolution or autopsy, researchers obtained, with sterile technique, cultures of either pneumococci or streptococci from 164 of 167 lung tissue samples.’”

“‘There were 89 pure cultures of pneumococci; 19 cultures from which only streptococci were recovered; 34 that yielded mixtures of pneumococci and/or streptococci; 22 that yielded a mixture of pneumococci, streptococci, and other organisms (prominently pneumococci and nonhemolytic streptococci); and 3 that yielded nonhemolytic streptococci alone. There were no negative lung culture results.’”

“Pneumococci or streptococci were found in ‘164 of (the) 167 lung tissue samples’ autopsied.  That is 98.2%. Bacteria was the killer.”

“When the United States declared war in April 1917, the fledgling Pharmaceutical industry had something they had never had before – a large supply of human test subjects in the form of the US military’s first draft.”

“Pre-war in 1917, the US Army was 286,000 men. Post-war in 1920, the US army disbanded, and had 296,000 men.”

“During the war years 1918-19, the US Army ballooned to 6,000,000 men, with 2,000,000 men being sent overseas. The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research took advantage of this new pool of human guinea pigs to conduct vaccine experiments.”

“Between January 21st and June 4th of 1918, Dr. (Frederick) Gates reports on an experiment where soldiers were given 3 doses of a bacterial meningitis vaccine. Those conducting the experiment on the soldiers were just spitballing dosages of a vaccine serum made in horses.”

“The vaccination regime was designed to be 3 doses. 4,792 men received the first dose, but only 4,257 got the 2nd dose (down 11%), and only 3702 received all three doses (down 22.7%).”

“A total of 1,090 men were not there for the 3rd dose. What happened to these soldiers? Were they shipped East by train from Kansas to board a ship to Europe? Were they in the Fort Riley hospital? Dr. Gates’ report doesn’t tell us.”

“An article accompanying the American Experience broadcast I watched sheds some light on where these 1,090 men might be. Gates began his experiments in January 1918.”

“By March of that year, ‘100 men a day’ were entering the infirmary at Fort Riley.”

“Are some of these the men missing from Dr. Gates’ report – the ones who did not get the 2nd or 3rd dose?”

“‘… Shortly before breakfast on Monday, March 11, the first domino would fall signaling the commencement of the first wave of the 1918 influenza.’”

“‘Company cook Albert Gitchell reported to the camp infirmary with complaints of a ‘bad cold.’”

“‘Right behind him came Corporal Lee W. Drake voicing similar complaints.’”

“‘By noon, camp surgeon Edward R. Schreiner had over 100 sick men on his hands, all apparently suffering from the same malady…’”

“Gates does report that several of the men in the experiment had flu-like symptoms: coughs, vomiting and diarrhea after receiving the vaccine.”

“These symptoms are a disaster for men living in barracks, travelling on trains to the Atlantic coast, sailing to Europe, and living and fighting in trenches.”

“The unsanitary conditions at each step of the journey are an ideal environment for a contagious disease like bacterial pneumonia to spread.”

 “‘Reactions.– … Several cases of looseness of the bowels or transient diarrhea were noted. This symptom had not been encountered before. Careful inquiry in individual cases often elicited the information that men who complained of the effects of vaccination were suffering from mild coryza, bronchitis, etc., at the time of injection.’”

“‘Sometimes the reaction was initiated by a chill or chilly sensation, and a number of men complained of fever or feverish sensations during the following night.’”

“‘Next in frequency came nausea (occasionally vomiting), dizziness, and general ‘aches and pains’ in the joints and muscles, which in a few instances were especially localized in the neck or lumbar region, causing stiff neck or stiff back. A few injections were followed by diarrhea.’”

“‘The reactions, therefore, occasionally simulated the onset of epidemic meningitis and several vaccinated men were sent as suspects to the Base Hospital for diagnosis.’”

“According to Gates, they injected random dosages of an experimental bacterial meningitis vaccine into soldiers. Afterwards, some of the soldiers had symptoms which ‘simulated’ meningitis, but Dr. Gates advances the fantastical claim that it wasn’t actual meningitis.

The soldiers developed flu-like symptoms. Bacterial meningitis, then and now, is known to mimic flu-like symptoms.”

“Perhaps the similarity of early symptoms of bacterial meningitis and bacterial pneumonia to symptoms of flu is why the vaccine experiments at Fort Riley have been able to escape scrutiny as a potential cause of the Spanish Flu for 100 years and counting.”

---

[1] p. 62 Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and The Forgotten History | Humphries MD, Suzanne, Bystrianyk, Roman

[2] Ibid

[3] p.82 Ibid

[4] p.iv Ibid

[5] p.85 Murder by Injection Eustace Mullins

[6] Did a Vaccine Experiment on U.S. Soldiers Cause the “Spanish Flu”?

[7] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2599911/ One of the authors was Anthony Fauci