Now that the Deep State’s FBI is going after Trump

Is Trump a “New Hitler”?

Letters from Vienna #83

Now that the Deep State’s FBI is going after Trump or

Is Trump a “New Hitler”?

One of the few events of 1983 I recall (other than the “heroic” invasion of Grenada) was the opening of the brash and hideous Trump Tower. By end of the decade I was so heartily sick to death of reading of Trump’s egomania, vanity and vulgarity that his bankruptcy came as something of a relief.

Yet, to my horror, he reemerged from each fresh financial catastrophe unscathed and rose, like a phoenix, from the ashes. What, I asked myself, when I heard his vast debts had been written off once more, had been the price he’d paid? When he ran for the presidency in 2016 I had my answer.

What exactly the true story behind his play for office actually was we’ll probably never know. What struck me at the time though was that the Establishment preferred either Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton and wasn’t entirely happy when it got Donald Trump.

Bush failed early and when it emerged that Killary’s lesbian lover had intimate links to al Qaida (the fact that Killary was literally unfit for office, could hardly control her bodily functions and needed to be dragged off the scene by secret service men, didn’t help) Trump became the man of reluctant choice.

Of course, this could have been the plan all along. There were many signs that the Deep State had signalled a Trump presidency as being on the cards (the same applied to Schwarzenegger but he never quite made it) but it was never a sure thing.

Killary on the other hand thought she had it all in the bag yet found to her horror that fate can play diabolical tricks on one.

Somebody, preferably a foreign entity, needed to be blamed for this unhappy state of affairs and the story of “Russiagate” was duly invented, as much to assuage Killary’s wounded pride as anything else. This disinformation campaign was quickly debunked yet it still mysteriously persists to this very day. The joke is, of course, that it was Clinton who had dubious dealings with the Russians rather than Trump.

Trump’s followers were denounced as “right-wing” “populists” while he himself was compared to old Schicklgruber himself. Which seemed perfectly natural under the circumstances. After all: he wanted to build a wall along America’s southern border! Was that not outrageous? A wall, which might actually hinder the drug trade! Of course, the Deep State didn’t want anything to inhibit its main source of income, so Trump was duly denounced by the corrupt and mendacious media; and the dumb, benighted masses applauded.

Had Killary been elected on the other hand she’d most probably have unleashed World War Three at the behest of the Deep State. And what was so terribly wrong with murdering babies in Haiti? Was that not what every healthy American needed to do? The “Liberals” didn’t seem to mind, just as they don’t seem to mind now that Biden’s nickname is “pedo Pete” or the fact that he clearly suffers from Dementia or that he’s perfectly open about how the 2020 election was rigged on his behalf, or for that matter that he has borrowed vast sums to support Nazis in the Ukraine and brought America to the brink of nuclear war with both Russia and China. The main thing: “Liberal”, the details never seem to matter.

Abolishing Property à la Marx

Which brings me to a point that ties in with my previous letters: why are those who are either critical or opposed to the “Globalist” agenda (Agenda 21/NWO etc.) descried as being “right-wing”? Why not “left-wing”? The answer seems to lie in the Illuminati wish to abolish property (à la Marx). Some argue that Marxism demands an end to the class system and the handing over of the means of production to “the people” but these two points are hollow phrases, wholly without meaning. Once the main point has been conceded, once all property is in the hands of the state (which means it will be in the hands of the Satanist Deep State) we’ll all be reduced to slavery. Thus, we’ll all be the same class of slave while the (Deep) state will hold on to the means of production “in trust”, “on behalf of the people”.

Is Trump a “New Hitler”?

The comparison with old Schicklgruber is extremely illuminating. Only three indisputable facts about Old Adolf are worth noting: Rothschild blood ran in his veins, his corpse was never found in Berlin and the Americans went looking for him after the war (according to the FBI he was to be found in Argentina).

Trump is undoubtedly also a Deep State actor, a Pied Piper of Hamlin, but without Old Adolf’s Wagnarian ambitions. Trump’s current role is to provide “controlled opposition” to the Globalist Agenda. His supporters look to him as a father figure, as a saviour, but he ultimately betrayed them in 2020. The election was rigged, obviously so, yet he raised no objection.

The January 6th theatrics, when barriers were opened to let peaceful demonstrators “invade Congress” and paid agitators raised hell, was a far cry from any form of “rebellion”.

There were moments when it seemed that part of the Establishment would in fact rebel and the military might assume power but that was a grim prospect, not one to be wished lightly.

And so, Biden, the selected candidate of the Deep State who only a few million actually voted for, is free to demolish America, which he is doing with a speed and ruthlessness that is truly quite breathtaking.

So, I was somewhat alarmed and surprised when I saw on social media the depth and breadth of Schadenfreude at Trump’s discomfort after the FBI raid on his home. Was it legal? Probably not. Was it necessary? Probably not. Was it Mafia style intimidation? Most certainly.

Why the hatred for Trump? Was it something he’d actually done? Or was it something he merely represented?

In the course of his presidency Trump achieved very little; he didn’t even manage to build his beloved wall. He was guilty of an appalling war crime: the treacherous murder of Qasem Soleimani, whose security had been guaranteed by the Americans (he’d been involved in peace negotiations at the time) and the diplomatic blunder of moving the US embassy to Jerusalem. Trump also went along with the Scamdemic, supported the use of toxic and deadly Remdesivir (which probably accounted for the vast majority of “Covid deaths”) and continues to push the jab, even out of office. What more could the Deep State possibly desire of him?

Yet, to his credit: he didn’t start a single war, which is probably the real reason the morally depraved “main stream media” hate him so much.

Above all, and this point has been raised by Jackson Hinkle: the raid on Trump’s home represents a dangerous precedent. The Deep State can get anyone anywhere and it is increasingly throwing both rule of law and caution to the wind. These are indeed troubling times.