Letter to Walter J. Baeyens I

What is the Global Deep State?

Apr 12, 2023

Letters from Vienna #150

Letter to Walter J. Baeyens I

Dear Mr Baeyens,

You wrote: “Canadian journalist and historian Matthew Ehret interprets the failed foundation of the League of Nations in 1920 as a first (non-military) attempt of the British elites to reconquer the USA via the strategy of gradually siphoning off its sovereignty into supra-national power structures. Before that, of course, there had been the American Civil War, a British-French attempt at reconquering the USA by military force. The Union was saved by the intervention of the Russian fleet. The foundation of the UN and NATO after WW2 was the second (successful) attempt. Today we witness the UN using the WHO as a spearpoint to that end. The International Health Regulations and “Pandemic Preparedness” will soon provide the WHO with tyrannical powers...”

I’m a huge fan of Matthew Ehret and am sure you represent his views accurately; for the sake of argument, I’ll assume that is the case.

What is the Global Deep State?

It’s very difficult to pin down with any degree of certainty or accuracy what exactly is the (Global) Deep State; elements of it are hidden in plain sight (e.g. the Vatican, NATO, the EU, the BIS, the CIA & the UN) while the exact role of many of its component parts (e.g. the Rosicrucians, the Jesuits & the Freemasons) can merely be surmised. I’ve quoted the introduction to “Tragedy and Hope” at least twice in my letters (#45[1] & #77[2]) and have no desire to bore you with its details once more. One sentence from my Letter #148[3] (a quote from Antony C. Sutton) I think quite telling: “It is important to note as we develop our story that General Motors, Ford, General Electric, DuPont and the handful of U.S. companies intimately involved with the development of Nazi Germany were — except for the Ford Motor Company — controlled by the Wall Street elite — the J.P. Morgan firm, the Rockefeller Chase Bank and to a lesser extent the Warburg Manhattan bank.” Certain names of specific oligarchic families, such as the Rockefellers and Warburgs, keep recurring; this is not without significance. Nor is the concept of oligarchy (letter #85[4]) irrelevant. It’s certainly true that we should be on our guard against what Kai Moltke terms “monopolistic capitalism” (rather than capitalism) but this is merely an extension of oligarchy (capitalism per se doesn’t exist).

As I’ve written again and again: the names of the individual oligarchic families don’t really matter but it’s safe to say that the core of them are Satanists and that their end game is to establish the reign of Satan on earth. Within this central group are differences, for example: between Freemason Satanists and Sabbatean/Frankist Satanists, but ultimately their goals are pretty much identical. I’ve quoted the Albert Pike letter of 1871 (#44[5]) and have no wish to repeat that either. I also think the term “Illuminati/Freemasons”, which Thomas Mann employed, extremely useful too.

What Caused World War One?

It’s only rarely that one sees the Deep State in action, most of its dealings are clandestine. One of those occasions was World War One (see my letters: #114[6] & #116[7]).

In the narrative I was taught at school World War One was caused by “Nationalism” and the “League of Nations” was the attempt to prevent future wars; this noble project failed on account of American “isolationism” (selfishness). “Nationalism” also gave rise to World War Two, after which the United Nations was founded; negotiations from now on would supplant armed conflict and “Internationalism” would supplant “Nationalism”, which would be rooted out and destroyed.

For years I accepted this narrative but the truth is: it never really made much sense. Either the German Kaiser was a tyrant and Germany an imperialist, expansionist bully or the Kaiser was weak, which meant that he was forced into war by “Nationalism”; one simply couldn’t have it both ways. And if “Nationalism” was the driving force in Vienna in 1914, which “Nationalism” was it? Austro-German “Nationalism”? Hardly. Something else was in play.

Over the years my view of this matter has changed somewhat. Now, I’m persuaded that the world wars were fought for the reasons given in the Pike Letter but also in order to create the narrative, which led to the founding of both the League of Nations and the United Nations. And, if one pauses to think for a moment: one realises that the United Nations has done very little to actually prevent war and has actually fostered it, most noticeably by furthering the creation of the colonialist/settler colony in Palestine. Another important action was the employment of troops to prop up the extreme-right-wing government in South Korea after it had attacked the North (see letter #50[8]). Again, and again the UN has fostered rather than thwarted the Anglo-American Empire in its wars of conquest and plunder, most notably in Vietnam in the 1960s, in Yugoslavia in the 1990s and against Iraq between 1991 and 2003. Again, and again, the UN erred on the side of evil, such as when it propped up Saddam Hussein at the expense of his people, while hundreds of thousands of children died from the UN embargo. The crimes of the UN are legion and the sooner it is abolished the better.

What is confusing for many, such as Dean Henderson, is the fact that the Anglo-American Empire (or as Dean Henderson terms it: “the Crown”) is simply one manifestation of the Global Deep State. Bolshevik Russia, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Communist China are other manifestations of this oligarchic hydra. National boundaries have never been of interest to it and it has always acted in an “international” fashion. It has always shaped and reshaped borders. Having said that: there are often tensions within the Globalist Deep State. Thus, in 1940, the French and British were poised to attack Russia when the Blitzkrieg destroyed their armies.

It’s perfectly conceivable that the Global Deep State would have been content with a “German solution” to the “European problem”. The Nazis used the same language later used by the “democratic” EU and their purported aim was much the same (“peace, unity” (and oppression)). Yet the danger of a German alliance with Russia was simply too great and thus the Deep State employed its agents to create strife between the two, strife which led to the completely insane and self-destructive attack upon the Soviet Union in 1941. That Hitler was a Deep State actor who disappeared from the stage and fled (in cowardly fashion) to South America can hardly be doubted (see Letter #145[9]). He was a fraud, all along, and many still remain deceived. Dividing Germany from Russia (and blowing up Nordstream II) by means of provoking a war in the Ukraine can be seen as a continuation of this policy.

In the same vein: the creation of the Club of Rome, “Climate Change” propaganda, and the “Genocide by Jab” (under the aegis of the UN) can be seen as an extension of the same fundamental agenda: the strengthening the power of the oligarchy, the “High Cabal”, while reducing the world’s population and reducing the survivors to slavery.

To a large extent: the matter really isn’t that complicated. A ruthless group of psychopathic families have seen the opportunity modern technology affords and have seized it in order to dominate the entirety of humanity.

It is up to us to set ourselves free. Once we have liberated our minds and understand what is going on: their power will vanish. The emperor truly has no clothes and it’s merely a matter of time before everyone sees it.

[1]