Letter to Richard Medhurst #19
Reasons for War II: Messianism, Satanism and the Great Game
Reasons for War II
“Anyone who has studied this religion in any depth” Robert Wolfe tells us “can have no doubt as to what it was all about. It was about the expectation that if the Jews performed the mitzvot correctly, the Messiah would come and restore the Jews to the land of their birth. This was the faith which sustained the Jewish people during the long centuries of exile, segregation and persecution. If there was a difference among Jews, it was between those who passively awaited the coming of the Messiah and those who sought to ‘force the end’ by actions intended to bring about the ingathering of the exiles even without divine intervention.”
“From the 13th century onwards, those who sought to ‘force the end’ were identified with the teachings of Kabbalah. And central to Kabbalah was a text known as the ‘Zohar’, which taught that only in the land of Israel could the religion of the Jews reach its full stature. Starting in the late 15th century in connection with the expulsion from Spain and Portugal and the rise of the Ottoman empire, literally tens of thousands of Kabbalists, most of them Sephardim, did in fact settle in the land of Israel in the ‘four holy cities’ of Jerusalem, Safed, Tiberias and Hebron. These Kabbalists were Zionists in all but name, and their Zionism was a direct expression of the religion of the Jews as they understood it.”
“Orthodox Judaism today also claims to perpetuate the Messianic tradition, but this claim has become highly suspect. Most Hasidim, who constitute the dominant element among Orthodox Jews today, regard the state of Israel as an illegitimate entity precisely because it was not brought into being by miracles. They say that they are still awaiting the coming of the Messiah and in the meanwhile claim to owe no real allegiance to the state of Israel. In short, their Messianism has no practical result, while the secular Messianism which did have a practical result they scorn and disdain.”[1]
According to Wolfgang Eggert: “Perhaps the most central focus of the “Fullfill Prophecy” activists revolves around the temple of the mythical Jewish King Solomon.”
“Since the beginning of the Third World War (against “terror”) was announced by Bush administration circles, the Redemption Camp has been looking with great excitement at the Old Testament sites in Jerusalem. Reason: For the ‘last days’, in which the apocalyptic battle between the superpowers Gog and Magog begins, the construction of the third temple is expected here at a supposedly historical site, on the Temple Mount – where today with the 1,300-year-old Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock (from here, according to Muslim tradition, Mohammed ascended to heaven) are central shrines of Islam; they should now go.”[2]
It mustn’t be forgotten that the immensely powerful (Satanist) Sabbatean-Frankists, such as the Rothschilds, are working within this Messianic tradition, albeit in a profoundly perverted fashion. For them: only once evil is omnipresent will the Messiah appear. Their influence shouldn’t be underestimated; perhaps they’re the driving force to all that’s happening in the Middle East.
There has always been a curious confluence between deep religious or Satanic currents within the Deep State and naked economic imperialism and it’s often difficult to tell which has the upper hand.
Is the current aim of the exercise to provoke Iran by committing genocide in Gaza, is it Armageddon or is it both of the above? After all: an attack on Iran has long been on the cards and was only put off because of the vulnerability of US forces in Iraq and due to the defeat in Lebanon in 2006.
Is the real plan the one adumbrated by Pike in 1871?
“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion...We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”
The Grand Chess Board
In 1992 Bernard Lewis observed: “If the prophets of doom are right, if Western civilization declines and decays and the center of gravity of the world shifts from the Atlantic to the Pacific, as it had already previously shifted from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic, then perhaps the Middle East might be contested by Far Eastern powers, as it was once contested by the powers of Europe.”
In order to counterbalance its ever-weakening economic power, the Anglo-American Empire reacted militarily and launched an ambitious plan to conquer eight countries in just a few years: Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. If the attacks weren’t able to bring the countries within “Western orbit” then they’d at least leave chaos in their wake. Disruption and destruction were the order of the day, either by means of direct military intervention or by Western/Israeli Deep State proxies such as al Qaeda, ISIS or Hamas. In the case of the Arab Spring even social media was employed to achieve the desired results.
To a certain extent Anglo-American fears were justified. One of the countries slated for invasion: Sudan has since become a Chinese client. In order to counterbalance Chinese influence the Americans have simply carved South Sudan out of Sudan.
Lewis explained: “The real danger is not commercial extortion, but politically motivated monopoly ... In addition to oil there is another concern, perhaps not immediate but already causing some alarm: the coming nuclearization of the Middle East by the acquisition of nuclear weapons, or perhaps even the building of a nuclear capacity by one or more potentially hostile powers in the region. This is in the long run probably inevitable. At best it can be postponed, limited and perhaps controlled.”
As a solution to this problem he proposed “Lebanonization”: “Another possibility, which could even be precipitated by fundamentalism, is what has of late become fashionable to call ‘Lebanonization.’ Most of the states of the Middle East — Egypt is an obvious exception — are of recent and artificial construction and are vulnerable to such a process. If the central power is sufficiently weakened, there is no real civil society to hold the polity together, no real sense of common national identity or overriding allegiance to the nation-state. The state then disintegrates — as happened in Lebanon — into a chaos of squabbling, feuding, fighting sects, tribes, regions and parties. If things go badly… central governments falter and collapse...”
In the same way that Lewis’ ideas are vital to understanding what is currently happening in the Middle East, so are those embodied in a paper entitled: “A Clean Break”, which was written on behalf of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996.
It argued that it was necessary for Israel to “restore its strategic initiative”, to contain, destabilize, and roll-back some of its most dangerous threats, nurture alternatives to Arafat and abandon comprehensive peace in favor of a “balance of power”.
One of the main points was that Israel should seize “the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran.”
Israel, it argued, should “abandon the slogan ‘comprehensive peace’ and move to ...weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq — an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right — as a means of foiling Syria’s regional ambitions.”
This confluence of Messianism, Satanism and Great Game politics is truly deadly.
[1] https://israelforever.org/interact/blog/zionism_as_judaism/
[2] Erst Manhattan - Dann Berlin Wolfgang Eggert
And Oded Yinon