Letters from Vienna #174
Letter to Niklas Frank III
Is Dr. Bhakdi a Nazi?
Dear Mr. Frank,
The question I left off with (what constitutes a Nazi and is Dr. Bhakdi, who will be charged in court tomorrow, one too?) wasn’t intended as a joke, although it will induce much mirth in many.
Dr. Bhakdi’s situation is, sadly, a serious one and goes a long way to show in which way laws concerning Germany’s past are currently open to abuse.
I’ll remind you, in case you’ve forgotten, of the accusation:
Dear Sir or Madam,
According to § 160 I of the Code of Criminal Procedure, please take note with this email that Mr Sucharit Bhakdi has very probably committed a punishable offence against § 130 Ill of the Criminal Code.
Mr Bhakdi publicly commented on the Holocaust as follows:
“With the approval of the vaccines the first milestone of the agenda has been achieved and the race is on to achieve the ultimate goal. This ultimate goal is the creation of the new reality and involves nothing other than the second Holocaust.”
By putting the vaccination—which is demonstrably harmless—against the Corona virus on par with the Holocaust, he is belittling the genocide of the National Socialists in the 3rd Reich and thus fulfilling the constituent elements of § 130 III StGB [StGB = Criminal Code].
The original statement can be found here:
https://twitter.com/humbughund/status/1478061571339341831
and in the attachment to this email. Since you have now become aware of the offence that has been committed, I ask you to commence an investigation.
I myself am not further connected with the matter and only want Mr. Bhakdi to be held accountable for his statement. Therefore, I request you to take this information as a cause for investigation, but not include my name in the file.”
To clarify matters it’s important to know what is entailed in this law:
who, in a manner likely to disturb the public peace,
1.
incites hatred, calls for violent or arbitrary measures against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group, part of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of an aforementioned group or part of the population
2.
attacks the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously slandering or slandering an aforementioned group, part of the population or an individual because of his or her membership of an aforementioned group or part of the population,
shall be punished with imprisonment from three months to five years.
(2) Anyone who
1.
disseminates content (§ 11 Paragraph 3) or makes it accessible to the public or offers, leaves or makes available content (§ 11 Paragraph 3) to a person under the age of eighteen who
a)
incites hatred against a group specified in subsection 1 number 1, against parts of the population or against an individual because of their membership of a group specified in subsection 1 number 1 or part of the population,
b)
calls for violent or arbitrary measures against persons or groups of persons referred to in letter a, or
c)
attacks the human dignity of persons or groups of persons referred to in letter a by insulting them, maliciously slandering them or slandering them, or
2.
produces, obtains, supplies, keeps in stock, offers, advertises content referred to in number 1 letters a to c (§ 11 Paragraph 3) or undertakes to import or export it in order to use it within the meaning of number 1 or another person to allow such use.[1]
Given the fact that Dr. Zelenko and many Holocaust survivors have compared the ongoing Genocide by Jab (see letter #171[2]) to the Holocaust it’s surely acceptable to do so.
Is Dr. Bhakdi to go to prison for stating the obvious?
In which way are you guilty, by virtue of your inaction (surely you ought to jump up and scream at such injustice!) and your ignorance?
I shall assume, for the sake of argument, that you are ignorant of what is happening, by which I mean: you are ignorant of the full scope and significance of the “Genocide by Jab”. You might well use a term Horst throws around liberally: “conspiracy theorist” but sooner or later even the hardest sceptics won’t be able to ignore hard, cold facts, which stare in their eyes.
And if you are ignorant of what is going on at the present: how can you condemn the Germans in the past who pleaded ignorance?
How do you know what exactly your father knew and didn’t?
To what extent did both your father and Otto von Wächter ignore or rationalise (because it made life easier) what was happening (just as many ignore the Genocide by Jab)?
I will leave off for the present as this letter has urgency:
Tomorrow Dr. Bhakdi is going to court.
Best,
Michael
[1] https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__130.html
„Wer in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören,
1.
gegen eine nationale, rassische, religiöse oder durch ihre ethnische Herkunft bestimmte Gruppe, gegen Teile der Bevölkerung oder gegen einen Einzelnen wegen dessen Zugehörigkeit zu einer vorbezeichneten Gruppe oder zu einem Teil der Bevölkerung zum Hass aufstachelt, zu Gewalt- oder Willkürmaßnahmen auffordert oder
2.
die Menschenwürde anderer dadurch angreift, dass er eine vorbezeichnete Gruppe, Teile der Bevölkerung oder einen Einzelnen wegen dessen Zugehörigkeit zu einer vorbezeichneten Gruppe oder zu einem Teil der Bevölkerung beschimpft, böswillig verächtlich macht oder verleumdet,
wird mit Freiheitsstrafe von drei Monaten bis zu fünf Jahren bestraft.
(2) Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu drei Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer
1.
einen Inhalt (§ 11 Absatz 3) verbreitet oder der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich macht oder einer Person unter achtzehn Jahren einen Inhalt (§ 11 Absatz 3) anbietet, überlässt oder zugänglich macht, der
a)
zum Hass gegen eine in Absatz 1 Nummer 1 bezeichnete Gruppe, gegen Teile der Bevölkerung oder gegen einen Einzelnen wegen dessen Zugehörigkeit zu einer in Absatz 1 Nummer 1 bezeichneten Gruppe oder zu einem Teil der Bevölkerung aufstachelt,
b)
zu Gewalt- oder Willkürmaßnahmen gegen in Buchstabe a genannte Personen oder Personenmehrheiten auffordert oder
c)
die Menschenwürde von in Buchstabe a genannten Personen oder Personenmehrheiten dadurch angreift, dass diese beschimpft, böswillig verächtlich gemacht oder verleumdet werden oder
2.
einen in Nummer 1 Buchstabe a bis c bezeichneten Inhalt (§ 11 Absatz 3) herstellt, bezieht, liefert, vorrätig hält, anbietet, bewirbt oder es unternimmt, diesen ein- oder auszuführen, um ihn im Sinne der Nummer 1 zu verwenden oder einer anderen Person eine solche Verwendung zu ermöglichen.”
[2] https://lettersfromvienna.substack.com/p/letter-to-dr-sucharit-bhakdi-vii