Letters from Vienna #164
Letter to Horst von Wächter VII
The Anglo-American Empire and the Rise of Fascism IV
Dear Horst,
Yes, I’m sure you’re right: part of the explanation for “the slander goes back to Simon Wiesenthal, who wrote in the accompanying article in the WELTPRESSE of September 9, 1949 that my father was responsible “for the deaths of about a million Jews and Poles”. It is revenge for Wiesenthal blaming my father for loading his mother at the Lemberg train station.” One cannot seriously blame Wiesenthal for his sense of grievance; your father was culpable of many crimes. However, having said that: this doesn’t explain why the film: “What Our Fathers Did” was made, or why the new evidence which exonerates your father (which Wiesenthal couldn’t have seen) is being so icily ignored by both the media and the academic establishment.
Again, the question arises: given the fact that the entire German military and industrial machine (especially IG Farben, which was directly responsible for Auschwitz) was geared to genocide everybody who didn’t resign or somehow escape was caught up, willingly or unwillingly, in the crime. If the entire enterprise was criminal from the word go (and designed not only to destroy Germany but the very notion of German honour and decency) then everybody, from the top to the very bottom was tainted in crime.
This essentially moral question remains current because governments haven’t become cleaner; on the contrary: the push toward One World Government has unleashed more bloodshed than even the Nazis could have imagined, and the same oligarchic, criminal, Satanic nexus, which I mentioned in my previous letter is responsible now as then.
To return to the statement I made, which you couldn’t accept:
Given that Himmler was in the pay of the Americans and Hitler was most probably working for the British (which is why he was able to escape to Argentina) it is fair to assume that the real object of the murderous policy was two-fold: old fashioned (eugenics driven) depopulation and the creation of Israel (by extermination of all the Jews who were suspected of being anti-Zionist).
Rand
You say that the Ukrainians and Eastern Europeans wish to join NATO because they fear the Russians. Can you not, in the same vein, concede that the Russians have an equal fear of a Waffen-SS similar organisation (NATO was modelled on the Waffen-SS)? And has not the policy of the Anglo-American Empire not been one of divide and rule? As you might or might not know a recently disclosed Rand paper shows that the aim of the exercise is to divide Germany from Russia by causing a war in the Ukraine: “One of the key goals of creating a military conflict in Ukraine for Washington, according to RAND, is to divide Europe and prevent the continued rapprochement between Germany and the Russian Federation. An important element in the implementation of these plans is the renunciation of Russian energy resources for Europe. According to RAND, Germany’s growing independence has made it harder for the United States to influence European governments. And, had the plan not been implemented, Europe would have become not only an economic but also a political competitor of the United States. The only possibility, to ensure that Germany refuses to use Russian energy carriers, is to involve both sides in a military conflict in Ukraine.”[1]
Brzezinski
This all chimes in with what was done in the past and with the strategy of Zbigniew Brzezinski to use the Ukraine against Russia: “According to Brzezinski [who passed away in May 2017], independent since 1991, Ukraine is an “important space on the Eurasian chessboard”, the control of which is supposed to make a domination over the world possible. In a post-Cold War world under the United States’ (US) geostrategic domination, Brzezinski identifies Ukraine – in Eurasia, alongside Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan – as the state “deserving America’s strongest geopolitical support”. While Ukraine’s independence affects the nature of Russia’s state itself, it is for the US “the critical state” among “key Eurasian geopolitical pivots”; ‘geopolitical pivots’ being defined as “states whose importance is derived not from their power and motivation but rather from their sensitive location and from the consequences of their potentially vulnerable condition for the behaviour of geostrategic players”, such as Russia.”[2]
Of Oil
Ultimately the war in the Ukraine has more to do with geopolitics than anything else and the cynicism on display is hidden in plain sight: “The Ukraine government, headed by Volodymyr Zelensky, has been using American taxpayers’ funds to pay dearly for the vitally needed diesel fuel that is keeping the Ukrainian army on the move in its war with Russia. It is unknown how much the Zelensky government is paying per gallon for the fuel, but the Pentagon was paying as much as $400 per gallon to transport gasoline from a port in Pakistan, via truck or parachute, into Afghanistan during the decades-long American war there.”
“What also is unknown is that Zelensky has been buying the fuel from Russia, the country with which it, and Washington, are at war, and the Ukrainian president and many in his entourage have been skimming untold millions from the American dollars earmarked for diesel fuel payments. One estimate by analysts from the Central Intelligence Agency put the embezzled funds at $400 million last year, at least; another expert compared the level of corruption in Kiev as approaching that of the Afghan war, “although there will be no professional audit reports emerging from the Ukraine.””
““Zelensky’s been buying discount diesel from the Russians,” one knowledgeable American intelligence official told me. “And who’s paying for the gas and oil? We are. Putin and his oligarchs are making millions” on it.”[3]
If one accepts, as I do, the authenticity of the Pike letter of 1871, then the genocide against the anti-Zionist Jews made perfect sense (for the Anglo-American Empire but NOT for Germany).
According to this letter:
“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.”
Just as one of the chief aims of the First World War was the destruction of Russia (“The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the “agentur” (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.”) so the aim of the Second was clear (the good news is that a Third World War is also planned!).
From the Anglo-American Empire’s standpoint: nothing could have served the purpose of dividing Germany from Russia and creating Israel (or, as the British termed it a “Jewish Ulster”) better than the Nazis. As Edwin Black has shown: the Haavara Agreement between the Nazis and Zionists was instrumental to the creation of Israel and Victor Klemperer even notes that Zionists wanted to build a statue dedicated to Hitler in Palestine! This goes a long way to explaining why the British and Americans financed the Nazis and why some proved dispensable (such as Himmler) while others were protected and provided with a new life in South America (such as Hitler) as a reward for their efforts.
The fact that your father didn’t go along with this scheme and most probably refused to serve the Anglo-American Empire and the Global Deep State (unlike Otto Skorzeny who later went on to plan the assassination of Kennedy) is the most likely reason he was eliminated (the Russians, British and Americans most probably worked hand in hand).
The solution I spoke of is, to my mind, the solution to the puzzle as to why the film: “What Our Fathers Did” was made and why your father (despite evidence that exonerates him) continues to be vilified: he refused to serve the Global Deep State.
Best,
Michael
[1] https://www.agcnews.eu/ukrainerussiawar-rand-predicts-usa-applies-eu-suffers/
[2] https://www.open-diplomacy.eu/blog/the-ukraine-crisis-or-the-revival-of-the-grand-chessboard-s-geopolitics