Letter to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi II
Are vaccines demonstrably harmless?
Letters from Vienna #166
Letter to Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi II
Are vaccines demonstrably harmless?
Dear Dr. Bhakdi,
I’m sure you won’t like to read these words, as I know you’re by no means what the manipulative, mendacious and corrupt media term an “anti-vaxxer”, but one has to ask the question:
Are vaccines demonstrably harmless?
The extraordinary answer seems to be: we don’t know; we’ve never actually bothered to find out.
Belief in vaccines seems to be a voodoo-like religion and seems to have NOTHING whatsoever to do with “science”. I’m sure you’ll contradict me most emphatically at this juncture but I’d nevertheless be grateful if you’d just hear me out.
For the sake of simplicity, I’ll define the “scientific method” as one employing a theory (hypothesis) based on empirical evidence, which can be tested and, to a certain degree, verified. Of course: as Popper pointed out: every “verification” is merely provisional: there is never a 100% certainty concerning a “truth gained”; everything is eternally “up in the air” and “open to revision”, which is annoying to say the least!
To quote Steve Kirsch:
“Nobody could locate a single credible objective US study showing that ANY vaccine in America is safe to use. In short, the “vaccines are safe” narrative is built on faith in seriously flawed studies. It’s turtles all the way down.”
“There is a huge flaw in the narrative that nobody really realized existed: The whole “vaccines are safe” narrative for the past 200 years is actually based on an assumption that all the vaccines are safe. There is actually no credible large-scale post-marketing study for any vaccine used in the US today that actually backs up this claim. It’s all based on faith in seriously flawed studies.”
“There isn’t a credible post-marketing objective epidemiological study for any vaccine in the US. That’s right. Not a single one.”
“Why isn’t there a study?”
“It’s not because it isn’t possible. In fact, every state in the US has the ability to do such a study.”
“It is because the states have never done the necessary studies nor will they expose data needed to allow the public to do the studies.”
“Will keeping public health data private improve clinical outcomes? No, of course not! It’s all kept hidden from view because there is no upside for them in doing the study. It can only end badly, very badly.”
“As Dr. Ryan Cole has often said, “You will never find what you don’t look for.””
“In short, it’s time to call a spade a spade: “the Emperor has no Clothes.” It’s turtles… turtles all the way down.”[1]
There’s one study I’ve read comparing children who’ve been vaccinated and those who haven’t and I’d like to quote it: “We can conclude that the unvaccinated children in this practice are not, overall, less healthy than the vaccinated and that indeed the vaccinated children appear to be significantly less healthy than the unvaccinated.”[2]
Another study pointed out that: “Prior to contemporary vaccination programs, ‘Crib death’ was so infrequent that it was not mentioned in infant mortality statistics. In the United States, national immunization campaigns were initiated in the 1960s when several new vaccines were introduced and actively recommended. For the first time in history, most US infants were required to receive several doses of DPT, polio, measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines. Shortly thereafter, in 1969, medical certifiers presented a new medical term—sudden infant death syndrome. In 1973, the National Center for Health Statistics added a new cause-of-death category—for SIDS—to the ICD. SIDS is defined as the sudden and unexpected death of an infant which remains unexplained after a thorough investigation. Although there are no specific symptoms associated with SIDS, an autopsy often reveals congestion and edema of the lungs and inflammatory changes in the respiratory system. By 1980, SIDS had become the leading cause of postneonatal mortality (deaths of infants from 28 days to one year old) in the United States.”[3]
The study concluded that “nations that require more vaccine doses tend to have higher infant mortality rates.”
One article I found states: “When a child acquires an infection naturally, the body mounts a full TH1 cell-mediated immune response, as well as a TH2 humoral immune response. This fully activated immune response will create lifelong or near lifelong immunity: if exposed again the child will not go through the intense infection process. By contrast, the vaccination process uses toxic adjuvants to aggressively overstimulate the TH2 humoral immune response, bypassing the critical TH1 cell-mediated immune response. This causes antibodies to be created against the injected antigens but does not actually confer immunity – hence the need for booster shots. Vaccine “effectiveness” is thus measured in terms of antibody production, rather than true immunity. A child can still acquire or manifest the very disease s/he is vaccinated against, and this does in fact often happen during disease outbreaks. Not only this, but the vaccination process itself may exhaust and disturb immune capacity, and lead to chronic health issues – seizures, autoimmune conditions, autism, allergies, asthma, lifelong damage and death. The longer term and cumulative risks of vaccines are in truth not examined or considered by those who make or test them, by public health authorities or by legislators seeking mandatory vaccination laws. They fail to ask a most basic and crucial scientific question: namely, whether mass vaccination causes or contributes to today’s surging chronic childhood illness rates.”[4]
Thomas Cowan states: “I rarely saw an unvaccinated child in my practice with a chronic disease of any sort. In general, these children ate healthy diets, played outside a lot, and were in good health. However, among the patients who were partially or fully vaccinated…I treated many who had one or more chronic health conditions, including asthma, eczema, seizures, and digestive disorders. As time went on, all of these disorders became more common among the partially or fully vaccinated children I saw. I believe this corresponded with the introduction in the late 1980s to the mid-1990s of certain adjuvants and excipients, as well as the introduction of more vaccines.”
…
“A few decades later, not only is it common for families to have at least one member who’s being treated for a chronic illness, but also autism, learning disabilities, asthma, and food allergies have exploded in their frequency and severity. For example:
1 in 2.5 children has an allergy
1 in 6 children has a development disability
1 in 9 children has attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)
1 in 11 children has asthma
1 in 13 children has severe food allergies
1 in 36 children has autism”[5]
A smoking gun seems to have been found for at least the latter problem:
“The continued presence of Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative, in vaccines is emblematic of the pervasive corruption and mismanagement in the CDC’s vaccine program…”
…
“For years I (Robert F. Kennedy, JR) have raised concerns about the pharmaceutical industry’s persistent use of Thimerosal in vaccines eighteen years after the FDA banned the use of this neurotoxin in other medicines and forced its removal from over one thousand over-the-counter drugs.”
…
“Thimerosal is still present in four American vaccines, including giant “bolus” doses in fifty million flu vaccines…”
…
“…studies link Thimerosal to a vast inventory of grim neurological disorders now epidemic in children, including ADD, ADHD, speech delay, tics, ASD, and autism.”
…
“Other studies demonstrate Thimerosal’s causation to asthma and a tenfold increase in Alzheimer’s in adults exposed to Thimerosal-laced flu-shots.”
…
“During three years of research, we were not able to find a single credible study in the open public health literature that show Thimerosal to be safe.”
…
“Mercury is a potent brain poison hundreds of times more toxic than lead. Science shows that the ethyl mercury in Thimerosal is fifty times as toxic to brain cells and twice as persistent in the brain as the heavily regulated methylmercury in fish.”
…
“Thimerosal is so toxic that when a doctor carelessly shatters a multidose flu vial, state laws require evacuation of the building and cleaning-up by trained hazmat crews…”[6]
I think that I’ve answered, however provisionally, the question:
Are vaccines demonstrably harmless?
I think, given the evidence I’ve presented, the answer is:
Most definitely not!
Best,
Michael
P.S. I’ll continue at a later date!
[2] https://healthchoicemaryland.org/ipak-vaxxed-vs-unvaxxed-study/
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21543527/
https://www.stopmandatoryvaccination.com/
[5] pp.13-14 Vaccines, Autoimmunity and the Changing Nature of Childhood Illness, Thomas Cowan MD
[6] pp. xv-xvi Vaccine Whistleblower by Kevin Barry. Forward by Robert F. Kennedy, JR
On the subject of SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). During the C-lockdowns the routine infant vaccination schedule was suspended. Result: almost no cases of SIDS were recorded.
A. Becker & M. Blaxill, 'Lessons from the lockdown, Fewer children dying', 18 june '20.
https://pubmedinfo.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Lessons-from-the-Lockdown-vF-6-16-
20.pdf
Thank you, Michael, for bringing this fallacy of safe and effective vaccines narrative up. I was trusting and my kids got all required doses but since researching the history of them when in lockdown I realised not have any been studied for safety, even after Thalidomide pregnancy sickness tablet scandal, the trials never use a placebo to test against, but a previous version if available or, if not, another vaccine with antigens which then obviously makes them appear to be safer than testing against a placebo. Not only that, but vaccine testing is way less robust in comparison to other medications. As actor Michael Cain said, "not a lot of people know that!"