Letter to Baron Bethell #16
Of Dodgy Tests
Letters from Vienna #193
Letter to Baron Bethell #16
Dear James,
The more carefully I consider the matter at hand the more I think it no mere accident that you were selected to be a junior minister at a time of the “Scamdemic”: your traumatic relationship to your mother renders you emotionally vulnerable while the fact you have a track record of making money makes you liable to slurs against your character. Ultimately, it’s neither important nor interesting whether you actually engaged in dodgy dealings or not, it suffices if enough people believe you did. In fact: you’re the ideal scapegoat for much of what has gone so horribly wrong over the past few years.
The fact that you campaign against pornography for children or against obesity for adults speaks for you but your close association with the dubious Matt Hancock, the Genocide by Jab and the Hospital Holocaust, doesn’t. How was it possible for you not to know what was going on? And if you did know: how do you justify these massive and appalling crimes against humanity? Do you sincerely believe the UK to be “overpopulated” and that the nation needs to be shrunk to a mere 13m? Do you seriously believe the nonsense about “man-made” “Global Warming”? Do you believe humans to be a curse for this earth? Are you a “nihilist”?
One of the aims of my letters is to show how wonderful life can be and that the world that’s being so thoroughly debased and destroyed is one of beauty, grace and civilisation. What it is being replaced with (the “new normal”) is evil, vile, vicious barbarity and permanent Auschwitz. Do you really want to be part of such a project? Why? Just for the money? Is that enough?
What we are now experiencing is truly horrific, and it’s just the start.
Tests
In 2020 you were minister for “Test and Trace” (please correct me if I happen to be wrong) yet I’d be very surprised if you knew what was entailed. It’s no accident that Jim Hacker was appointed to the Department of Administrative Affairs rather than the Department of Agriculture, for which he was better fitted, or that Alan Clark got Employment instead of the Ministry of Defense: amateurs in their respective fields tend to get the top jobs, making it much easier for the Deep State to manipulate them. How can one make decisions if one knows nothing? Obviously, one can’t. A minister is merely a “fig leaf for democracy” and there to rubber stamp a decision taken for him or her; in reality the state is fascist.
First one must begin with the inventor, Kary Mullis: “I don’t think you can misuse PCR,” he once explained. “[It is] the results; the interpretation of it. If they can find this virus in you at all – and with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.”
“Mullis does not explicitly say that the PCR technology is unsuitable for detecting a meaningful presence of COVID-19. How could he, given that he died before it came to light? But such a conclusion can safely be inferred:”
“It starts making you believe in the sort of Buddhist notion that everything is contained in everything else. If you can amplify one single molecule up to something you can really measure, which PCR can do, then there are just very few molecules that you don’t have at least one single one of in your body.”
“Mullis then addresses the question of what should be considered meaningful, which is the central issue with the use of the PCR tests. Do the ‘case’ numbers being used around the world by governments to impose police states and egregious lockdowns of the population, especially in my home state of Victoria, actually mean anything? The answer seems to be ‘no’:”
“That could be thought of as a misuse: to claim that it [a PCR test] is meaningful. It tells you something about nature and what is there. To test for that one thing and say it has a special meaning is, I think, the problem. The measurement for it is not exact; it is not as good as the measurement for apples. The tests are based on things that are invisible and the results are inferred in a sense. It allows you to take a miniscule amount of anything and make it measureable and then talk about it.”
“Mullis also addresses, by implication, another question about the incidence of ‘cases’. If you test positive – and Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration has admitted that they do not know if this means you are infected or not – are you actually sick? In the past that is what the word ‘cases’ has meant: someone unwell from a disease. Mullis’ position is clear [emphasis added – timecode 51:49]:”
“PCR is just a process that allows you to make a whole lot of something out of something. It doesn’t tell you that you are sick, or that the thing that you ended up with was going to hurt you or anything like that.”
“Mullis’ comments are unsurprising for anyone who has been paying attention to the behaviour of the authorities during the COVID-19 catastrophe. The technology relies on amplifying results many times over. If they are amplified less than about 35 times, no-one will test positive. If they are amplified 60 times, everyone will test positive. The flawed thinking is obvious enough.”
“Why is there is such a concerted effort to quell anyone exposing problems with the use of the technology? There is no doubt that these attacks are designed to deceive (including predictable use of that shoddy ad hominem phrase ‘conspiracy theory’, a rhetorical trick to insult people rather than address their arguments).”
“Look closely at the ‘fact checking’. The Reuters article uses a mixture of a straw man argument and a red herring. It asserts it was wrong to claim that Mullis said that: “PCR tests cannot detect free infectious viruses at all”. This is obviously a deliberate misrepresentation intended to wrongly characterise the opponents’ argument and then ‘expose’ it as false.”[1]
If the “Covid-tests” don’t test for “Covid” (which might or might not exist) what is their true purpose? Thankfully, some scientists in Slovakia took the trouble to find out:
“The analysis was performed in the months November 2020 to March 2021 on test sticks in sets. SD Biosensor, Abbott and Nadal in an unnamed hospital laboratory from Bratislava, Slovakia. The test swabs were from the sets used in surface testing in Slovakia and in hospitals.”
“Anyone who has at least a standard school microscope and a test microscope can verify the information regarding the test swabs… All information about test swabs, Darpa Hydrogels, and lithium is publicly available in scientific and corporate work…”
“…From this information it is clear that test sticks are a criminal tool of genocide in the population of Slovakia. This is a worldwide, thoughtful and carefully prepared event…”
“…After spawning a mixture of nylon fiber fragments, Darpa Hydrogel remains on the nasal mucosa under the pituitary and pineal gland along with lithium. This mixture immediately reacts with living structures to form crystals that are directionally oriented to the pineal gland, which has its own electromagnetic field. The shape of the crystals determines the type of hydrogel used. The crystals are conductive due to the lithium contained in it. The crystals can receive the signal from the transmitter to the cell and transmit signals from the cell to the transmitter. These are actually nano-antennas.”
“Lithium is an element (reference to Li) that does not occur naturally in humans. It is highly toxic to the pineal gland influence. In low doses it blocks it and in higher doses it can completely destroy it. Aluminum and mercury also have toxic effects on the pineal gland, which are widely used in vaccines. The pineal gland produces serotonin (a hormone of happiness) and controls human biorhythms. It is crucial for higher brain activity (creativity, foresight, sixth sense, etc.) and for social interactions of man…”
“Darpa Hydrogel (reference) is an artificial substance that creates a converter between the electromagnetic signal and living cell, tissue and organ. Converts an electromagnetic signal from a transmitter to a signal which a living cell understands and responds to…”[2]
If, instead of helping people you were providing them with dodgy tests for a disease which probably doesn’t exist (and actually poisoning them): how does that make you feel?
Best,
Michael
[1] https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/05/pcr-inventor-it-doesnt-tell-you-that-you-are-sick/
[2] https://www.pearl-hifi.com/11_Spirited_Growth/10_Health_Neg/04_Pandemics/05_COVID_19/Analysis_of_test_sticks_from_surface_testing_in_the_Slovak_Republic.pdf
Does one have to remain polite when communicating with criminels and their accomplices?