Letters from Vienna #191
Letter to Baron Bethell #14
Dear James,
I’m not sure as to whether you got the letter I sent you two years ago[1] but I fear it has had no or at best: little effect. At the time you were a junior minister in an infamous government, which will go down in history as being much worse than that of the Nazis. I wonder whether your children will defend you in the way Horst von Wächter defends his father Otto (see my letters to Horst von Wächter[2]) or will they denounce you as a mass murderer? Will your children be victims of the ongoing “revolution from above” (aka “The Great Reset”) or will they rebel against it? Either which way: it’s unlikely that either they or you will survive. You simply know too much, which is profoundly unfortunate.
I have puzzled over your actions for literally years but an interview with Jeremy Strong (of “Succession” fame) triggered a thought, a possible explanation, in my mind. What, I considered, if you’d been traumatised in your childhood?
Please bear with me as this will take a long time to unpack but given that the weather is simply appalling, and has been for over a week, I can’t resume my guided tour of Vienna in the form originally conceived. What I wanted to show you, above all else, was the world I know and love and the one, which looks set to be destroyed. Of the establishments pictured not a few have already closed and of the people: not a few of have already been murdered.
My Frame of Reference
Firstly, I must start by setting out my frame of reference, which differs considerably to that of the infamous “Sheeple”. To quote from one particularly interesting text:
“H.G. Wells, head of British foreign intelligence during World War I and the spiritual grandfather of the Aquarian Conspiracy, was a protégé of leading Darwinist T. H. Huxley, founder of the British Round Table intelligence organization along with Cecil Rhodes. The Round Table is one of the “open secret” secret societies directly linked to the Black Guelphs, better known as the House of Windsor. Another, is the Society of Carpocrates with its direct links to Queen Elisabeth II, a Black Guelph through her grandmother Queen Victoria. The most important member of the British Round Table was Baron Harold Anthony Caccia whose family is one of the oldest families in the Black Nobility. In turn, Venetian Black Nobility was interlocked with a secret organization OC (Organized Consul), controlled by the Thule Society, which functioned as the “mother organization” of a plethora of parties, societies, paramilitary units and terrorist groups. The “greatest” creations of the Thule Society were the Nazi Party and its degenerate leader, Adolf Hitler.”
“Wells, the novelist, was a member of the elite British oligarchic planning group, the Coefficients. Both the Round Table and the Coefficients were committed to the establishment of a “feudal empire run by an aristocracy which controlled all knowledge and technology and used them to rule over a population of ignorant, drugged plantation slaves.”
“The Coefficients were a cross between a diner’s club and a modern think-tank, which met monthly over dinners at London’s St. Ermin’s Hotel from 1902 to 1908. Among the members of this group was the powerful Lord Robert Cecil, elder statesman of Britain’s most powerful family, and a cousin to Arthur Balfour, then serving as Conservative Prime Minister. Lord Alfred Milner, the High Commissioner of South Africa also participated on a regular basis as well as Halford Mackinder, the newly appointed head of London School of Economics. Others involved were Earl Bertrand Russell as well as Sidney and Beatrice Webb, Fabian socialists and supporters of Mussolini.”
“In other words, the crowd behind H.G. Wells, were some of the most powerful empire builders belonging to the upper echelons of secret societies and financial interests.”
“The Bilderberg Group, in fact was a natural extrapolation of the Coefficients Club. Milner spoke of his vision for the future during a 1903 meeting, over half a century before the Bilderberg Group was founded. At the meeting, Milner stressed the point:”
““We must have an aristocracy – not of privilege, but of understanding and purpose – or mankind will fail…””[3]
A second, equally important point of reference is an interview with Ronald Bernard[4]. A third is Chris Hedges (despite the fact that he seems to be controlled opposition), who wrote:
“Neoliberalism as economic theory was always an absurdity. It had as much validity as past ruling ideologies such as the divine right of kings and fascism’s belief in the Übermensch. None of its vaunted promises were even remotely possible. Concentrating wealth in the hands of a global oligarchic elite—eight families now hold as much wealth as 50 percent of the world’s population—while demolishing government controls and regulations always creates massive income inequality and monopoly power, fuels political extremism and destroys democracy.”[5]
At a later date I’ll write a letter devoted to my books but, suffice it to say: they are rarely to be found in public libraries and not a few of them have been expunged from them, which is a worrying development, to say the least.
I’m aware that this letter is getting too long and will continue at a later date.
Best,
Michael
[1] Dear James,
It has been a long time since we’ve seen each other and I hardly recognize you in the images I see. Nevertheless, I hope you aren’t too much changed. I sincerely hope that you still retain the ideals of decency, honour and noblesse oblige of your youth and I sincerely hope you remain as open and critical as you once were. You were always in my eyes a “critical, thinking conservative”, which is why I liked you.
Above all: I hope you haven’t forgotten the words of John Stuart Mill:
“To prevent the weaker members of the community from being preyed upon by innumerable vultures, it was needful that there should be an animal of prey stronger than the rest, commissioned to keep them down. But as the king of the vultures would be no less bent upon preying on the flock than any of the minor harpies, it was indispensable to be in a perpetual attitude of defence against his beak and claws. The aim, therefore, of patriots was to set limits to the power which the ruler should be suffered to exercise over the community; and this limitation was what they meant by liberty.”
or Adam Smith:
“In the same manner, as we sympathize with the sorrow of our fellow-creature whenever we see his distress, so we likewise enter into his abhorrence and aversion for whatever has given occasion to it. Our heart, as it adopts and beats time to his grief, so is it likewise animated with that spirit by which he endeavours to drive away or destroy the cause of it. The indolent and passive fellow-feeling, by which we accompany him in his sufferings, readily gives way to that more vigorous and active sentiment by which we go along with him in the effort he makes, either to repel them, or to gratify his aversion to what has given occasion to them.”
I know you have struggled long and hard to attain a position of responsibility and I know that power has a charm and excitement all of its own. Nevertheless, as two students of history we both know perfectly well which names are remembered well and which ill. Do you really wish to sully your family name by association?
This entire situation might be unprecedented but we have both had an extremely good education and are both equal to the task at hand. I realize that it is difficult to cast off newfound honours and newfound joys but, in the name of your children, I beg you to reconsider your course of action. The current British government doesn’t need you but your country does and future governments might well do so too.
Please think above all about the average citizen, distant though they may be, and consider the wholly unnecessary humiliations and degradations they’re currently being forced to endure. Apply Adam Smith. Would you be willing to suffer equally such humiliation and such degradation? Wholly without need?
Please don’t sully your name with their suffering. If it isn’t possible to work for good, for reason, for moderation within government or to do what one knows is right then the only honourable course of action is to resign. Don’t be afraid to do so if this is what the situation requires. Above all else: think long and hard about the harsh responsibility weighing upon your soul.
Yours,
Michael B.
P.S. The calumny about me being a communist was always false. I always hated the b@stards.
[2] https://lettersfromvienna.substack.com/p/letter-to-horst-von-wachter-i
[3] pp.214-215 Tavistock Institute, Daniel Estulin
[5] https://canadiandimension.com/articles/view/neoliberalisms-dark-path-to-fascism?fbclid=IwAR0E0lO00U6Uqe1ubWMxXnKntroUxFcDnHD2-HuVlJOWbCyVKVJDeRiUCzE