Letter to a German Friend in Korea V

Stauffenberg or von Moltke?

Michael Buergermeister

Mar 30, 2023

Letters from Vienna #144

Letter to a German Friend in Korea V

Stauffenberg or von Moltke?

Dear I.,

That you accuse me of anti-Semitism hardly surprises. Anyone who questions the official narrative these days is labeled either an “anti-Semite” or “conspiracy theorist” (usually both). Why exactly anyone who refuses a poison injection should be an “anti-Semite” escapes me. Equally irksome is the assertion that one isn’t permitted to compare the persecution of the unvaccinated to that of the Jews. There are many survivors of the Holocaust who make exactly this comparison; one of them happens to be Vera Sharav[1] [2] [3] [4].

In August 2021 “concentration camp survivors, their sons, and daughters, and grandchildren, including persons of goodwill and conscience” signed a letter, which began with the words: “We, the survivors of the atrocities committed against humanity during the Second World War, feel bound to follow our conscience and write this letter. It is obvious to us that another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes. The majority of the world’s populace do not yet realize what is happening, for magnitude of an organized crime such as this is beyond their scope of experience. We, however, know. We remember the name Josef Mengele. Some of us have personal memories. We experience a déjà vu that is so horrifying that we rise to shield our poor fellow humans. The threatened innocents now include children, and even infants. In just four months, the COVID-19 vaccines have killed more people than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years. And people affected worst are between 18 and 64 years old – the group which was not in the Covid statistics. We call upon you to stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind immediately. What you call “vaccination” against SARS-Cov-2 is in truth a blasphemic encroachment into nature. Never before has immunization of the entire planet been accomplished by delivering a synthetic mRNA into the human body. It is a medical experiment to which the Nuremberg Code must be applied. The 10 ethical principles in this document represents a foundational code of medical ethics that was formulated during the Nuremberg Doctors Trial to ensure that human beings will never again be subjected to involuntary medical experimentation & procedures.”[5]

Given that it is anti-Semites who are behind this particular holocaust one shouldn’t be surprised that Israel has become one of the worst affected countries[6].

Dr. Zelenko[7], who has sadly passed away, was also perfectly clear in his statement: “The data” he wrote “suggests that we may currently be witnessing the greatest organized mass murder in the history of our world. The severity of this situation compels us to ask this critical question: will we rise to the defense of billions of innocent people? Or will we permit personal profit over justice, and be complicit? Networks of lawyers all over the world are preparing class-action lawsuits to prosecute all who are serving this criminal agenda. To all who have been complicit so far, we say: There is still time to turn and choose the side of truth. Please make the right choice.”[8]

Thankfully, many Globalists, such as Boris Johnson, Jacinda Ardern and Nicola Sturgeon have already resigned and many others are expected to fall in the near future. Democracy and the rule of law seem set to prevail, even within Britain[9]. Nevertheless, many hotheads will inevitably demand violent resistance to the Globalists and this is the theme of my current letter.

From a religious standpoint a Jew (defined as someone who actually follows the Torah) might well argue that what we are experiencing is the “wrath of God”. It is we who have sinned and who deserve chastisement. Rabbi Yaakov Shapiro writes: “The Torah tells us…that if we do mitzvos and keep the Torah, we will prosper in this world. And if we sin we will suffer retribution in this world.”[10]

Shortly before he was murdered by the Nazis Helmuth von Moltke, one of the leading figures of the so-called “Kreisau Circle”, wrote: “I’ve learned to be content with myself, I’ve learned the Bible in a way I probably never would have otherwise. I’ve experienced ups and downs, been humbled and lifted up again. Did the good Lord let me experience all this in order to make me ready for death, or did he release me into the world one more time? Even the question is improper.”[11]

Rachel Freudenburg writes: “Freya von Moltke (the widow of Helmuth von Moltke) explains that as time went on, the utopianism that inspired the members of the Kreisau Circle became more and more strongly rooted in European Christianity: “The majority of the people had not gone into this question of Christianity. One took it for granted, learned it in school, and went on with it into life. But the question became much more important with the fact that they really put everything of their lives into [the resistance] and had to face death and were thinking about why they were undertaking such an endeavor. The answers to all these questions brought them much closer to a Christianity they already sort of vaguely belonged to. Even the Socialists, who were the farthest away from thinking on Christian terms, became much more involved with Christianity while all this was going on. So, the group decided that the past of Western Europe had been built on Christianity and felt that the future should also be built on Christianity.” Again, we should not interpret Christianity—a broad term if ever there was one—too simply. The connections between Germany’s Churches and the Nazi government have become notorious indeed. What did Christianity mean for the members of the Kreisau Circle? What was the link between their spiritual lives and the ideals that guided their plans for Germany’s future? One obvious connection is their agreement that religious freedom (including the “freedom” to be Jewish) should be protected by the state. Additionally, the Kreisau Circle based its plans for Germany’s future on principles such as individual liberty, the rule of law, and the state’s obligation to protect the individual’s rights to peace, property, family, work, and education. Interestingly, though, individual rights did not come without some duties. The members of the Kreisau circle believed that each person should be involved in political processes at the grass roots level. (If we fantasize, for a brief moment, that we live in a world where everyone is ensnared in the bickering and backbiting of local politics, it is not difficult to see why the group was often castigated for its social utopianism.) The government imagined by the Kreisau Circle featured strong centralization with numerous well-developed, smaller political units. Because of the failures of the Weimar Republic, the members of the Kreisau Circle were reluctant to embrace democracy wholeheartedly. Nonetheless, they did believe that people should be politically active and needed to be trained to think beyond their own immediate interests. Involvement in self-government, they proposed, was one way to achieve this end. They theorized that a government based on small, local groups would encourage the political integration of individuals into their communities. Perhaps the encouragement of a certain communal mentality, whereby persons are taught to empathize with and take responsibility for others without giving up their own individuality, reflects the Kreisau Circle’s version of Christianity.”[12]

Ironically it was only after the Nazis had imprisoned von Moltke that “the colonels” such as Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg, Friedrich Olbricht and Henning von Tresckow, succeeded in pushing forward with their plan to assassinate Hitler, a plan von Moltke descried as a “Kerensky solution”. What was needed, he argued, was for the Nazis to fail and to be seen to fail. The worst possible state of affairs would be for the Nazis to claim that they would have succeeded had they not been “stabbed in the back”.

As luck would have it (had Stauffenberg used two instead of one explosive etc.) the attempt on Hitler’s life failed and many dissidents, including von Moltke, died as a direct result.

Apart from the obvious practical issue of getting rid of the entire Deep State and not just its heads (if we knew who they were!) violence is never the answer. The One World Government Globalist/Satanist project must fail and be seen to fail while a decentralised political system ought replace it.

[1] https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=249265520338717

[2] https://www.jfda.de/post/shoah-relativierung-mit-ansage-in-nuernberg

[3]