Creating Confusion on a Global Scale
In the vortex of Transhumanism
If “Global Warming” is one means of creating debilitating confusion “gender diversity” is another.
“Western societies” Jennifer Bilek tells us “are in the vortex of Transhumanism. We are being sucked in because this radical transhumanist agenda and its eugenicist underpinnings are obscured by a popular LGB human rights veneer.”
“‘Transgenderism’ is a word acting as a social bridge between transsexualism and transhumanism. It is an umbrella term with weak borders that allows this bridging quality to transhumanism to nimbly evade scrutiny. Transsexualism is primarily an adult male fetish that compulsively objectifies and covets womanhood. Men with autogynephilia (the professional name for this form of transsexualism) seek to medically appropriate the sexed humanity of women by purchasing surgical simulacrums of their sexed reality, in parts, to assuage their compulsion. It is the apex of the sex industries, reducing women to parts for commercial and sexual use.”
“Transhumanism is the movement to increase human lifespan and cognition through a more intimate melding with technology, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology. The transhumanist agenda sees immortality as its ultimate end goal and splits the mind from the body, like most religions. A transhumanist existence is one where biological realities, such as the border between male and female, would become irrelevant. Through virtual reality and fusion with technology, reproductive sex would become obsolete, and having sex would be reduced to a mind game, with our corporeality left behind.”
“The word ‘transgenderism’ obscures the escalation of a compulsive sexual fetish into the industry forming around it, an industry that erases women’s wholly sexed humanity in language, law, and all our institutions and markets dissociation from the sexed body as progressive to children and youth. Women only exist as parts to be consumed or commercially used for their reproductive capacities. Women are systematically dismantled using terms like ‘chest feeder,’ ‘womb haver,’ and even ‘surrogate.’”[1]
To a large extent the willingness of people to go along with the nonsense of “political correctness” make all of this possible. The idea of political correctness is the illusion that by changing language we change the world around us. In reality: the world stays the same but we ourselves grow incredibly confused. Not only does the world stay the same, its inherent inequalities and injustices invariably grow worse.
The brilliance of Jennifer Bilek is that she’s able to go into considerable detail on account of having spent so much time and energy on the subject.
“Dr. Olezeski,” she tells us “is an Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Yale University and the director and co-founder of their ‘gender program,’ a nice euphemism for clinics that medically attack the healthy sex of children and young adults. Yale’s gender program consumer base, she says, is 3 - 25 years old. Her cavalier manner in discussing this barbarism is only surpassed by the absence of the word dysphoria. She speaks of ‘gender-expansive individuals,’ those who identify as ‘transgender’ or ‘non-binary,’ and those on a ‘gender journey.’”
“For a decade, the gender lobby (aka elites invested in the techno-medical complex) has been promoting the idea of people (and children) with such intense discomfort in their skin that there is little choice but to mutilate their sex organs with drugs and subsequent surgeries, providing synthetic facsimiles of human genitalia, a now burgeoning market. Suddenly, there is no more talk about people with body dysphoria but of expression, a journey, and people (and children) with expansive feelings about their ‘gender.’”
“I have outlined in my previous research on the Pritzker family, one of the wealthiest families
in America, their plight to engineer the normalization of synthetic sex identities through funding of our medical, legal, cultural, military, educational, and other institutions. Yale University has been privy to a windfall of Pritzker cash and, subsequently, the creation of a growing program in manufacturing synthetic sex.”
“Karen Pritzker, part of the billionaire family, is worth $6.1B. Pritzker and her husband, Michael Vlock, have been funding Yale University since 2007 when they donated $3M to Yale’s pediatric clinic. They have subsequently doled out $20 M to Yale medical school. Karen Pritzker is the sister to Jennifer Pritzker, formerly James, the retired Lt army Colonel. The latter appropriated womanhood in 2013 and began systematizing the normalization of synthetic sexes through our institutions with heaps of cash. Like her brother, Karen Pritzker is invested in private medical tech, biotech, and medical device companies. She has also invested significantly in Apple corporation.”
“Dr. Olezeski has been weaponized like many in the medical community to institutionalize gender ideology, an elite technological religion devised to transform humanity, by immense amounts of propaganda selling medical-tech intrusions on sex as a progressive human rights movement.”[2]
The destruction of the family, population reduction and the introduction of legislation suitable for (gender neutral) robots are also the welcome by-products of this curious agenda, an agenda worthy of exact and intense study.
It's been going a long time. A friend I had a few years ago had a daughter at Cambridge. I was invited on a ski holiday with them to keep the mother company off-piste. I'd never met the girl before and it soon became obvious why I was invited along. In the chalet, there was no interaction between mum and daughter. The girl stayed in her room the whole time only coming out to prepare food for herself. She was unable to look directly at anyone she had to speak to and certainly no physical contact between mum and daughter. It took a bit of coaxing from me just to get her to stand close to her mum and put arms around each other for a photo. I soon realised something not quite right. In addition, her appearance was boyish, short cropped hair, very hairy legs and armpits, noticed when we went swimming, in total contrast to her mother, who's emergency handbag item was a pair of tweezers and magnifying mirror, used every morning! The mother told me that the daughter identified as androgenous, as did her boyfriend. She showed me a photo of the pair of them, her looking manly in trousers and him wearing a dress, with long flowing locks! I remember thinking to myself, I'm happy my kids weren't clever enough to go to Cambridge. I'm no longer in touch with the woman and have no idea of how things turned out for the daughter. From my reading, it appears people on the autism spectrum are more likely to have gender issues, and being "androgenous" doesn't mean the daughter actually wanted to be male, but I wonder if it was the first step, or was it just a phase?
Where will it end….