Challenging Globalist Lies I
On the Folly of Conformity I
It’s curious how challenging the BS of “Global Climate Change” quickly slides into challenging all Globalist lies. If one is a “right-wing conspiracy theorist” (how exactly is the opposition to Fascism or to genocide for that matter “right-wing”???) in one field one has no choice but to be one in all of them. After all: what we are confronted with is a murderous conspiracy so being a “conspiracy theorist” is, if anything, a badge of honor.
There is, beyond any shadow of doubt, an ongoing murderous conspiracy to depopulate the planet. The only real and pressing question is: who is really behind it (the Black Nobility, the Illuminati/Freemasons (as Thomas Mann thought), the Jesuits etc.?)? This issue demands deeper investigation.
My position on this particular topic is perfectly simple: whoever they might be: they are powerful oligarchs, kleptocrats, pedophiles but most important of all: they are Satanists. The details of the names of the families involved don’t really matter. Some are prominent and in the open while the majority (perhaps the more powerful ones?) are hidden in the dark.
Any idea stemming from the Globalist (Deep State) establishment must, consequently, be treated with extreme caution: whether the “global warming insanity”, “gender insanity”, “we must start World War Three insanity” or the “no borders insanity”. Everything needs to be called into question; everything is on the table and one has no choice but to take sides.
A “Globalist/Conformist” (one who might delude themselves into thinking they’re a social democrat whereas they’re in fact a classic National Socialist!) might argue something along the lines of the following:
Conspiracy theorists are “egoists who want a world of ignorant peons to serve, envy and admire them” while they themselves are “trying to hang onto social democracy and realize the liberating possibilities technology, science and general education have for everyone”. How exactly this works is beyond me but that is a matter for another day.
They may argue that the ongoing farmer’s rebellion is being “exploited by so-called climate sceptics to blame environmentalism for what is due to the follies of neo-Liberal economics and Neoconservative foreign policy”. They clearly fail to understand that the deliberate and conscious destruction of those who produce food is a clear way of generating famine (Gaza is simply an example of what is intended for all of us) and has nothing whatsoever to do with “the follies of neo-Liberal economics and Neoconservative foreign policy”.
Again, and again, the depopulation agenda becomes self-evident but fools, in the manner depicted in Biedermann und die Brandstifter (Max Frisch) fail to see it. They are lost in their own smugness, complacency, conformity, vanity, arrogance and egotism and live quite detached from reality. Research? Why on earth should they do that? Only conspiracy theorists do research!
They believe they possess “advanced, scientific knowledge” and denounce the “complete absence of science”. Science, for them, is quite simply an idol, a golden calf, a religion, and an especially irrational and illogical one at that. One must simply believe and God forbid anyone should call “science” into question! Such would be heresy and must be punishable by death!
Yet, at the same time it is evident that they have (for all their admiration of education!!!) no idea about philosophy, the philosophy of science or science itself. Science never produces final answers so believing in science is rather like saying: “I believe in temporary answers” or, perhaps more aptly: “I am too stupid to understand that there are temporary, contingent answers and there are permanent answers and that there is a difference between them.”
They make curious assertions such as: “The vast majority of authentic scientists agree on the proposition that man-made climate change is real and a problem” but have clearly failed to substantiate this assertion. Anybody who observes the fact that there is snow or that the climate has gotten colder instead of warmer is denounced as a “right-wing conspiracy theorist” and any scientist who calls this dogma into question is “inauthentic”.
They make statements such as: “the data show it is getting hotter on a global scale. That doesn’t mean it can’t be cold where you are.” And: “One does need a degree of training to understand climate science…” Obviously one needs a degree to blind one or stifle one’s thinking or simply deaden one’s brain. Even a five-year old can spot the glaring and egregious lie. If the climate is getting warmer, it must be, logically, getting warmer everywhere; global warming must, obviously, be global or not at all! There is no such thing as “selective global warming,” which is clearly an oxymoron.